Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Fire Dog Year Demands on 9-11 Increase
- This topic has 6 replies, 6 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 8 months ago by IO.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 3, 2006 at 3:15 pm #11233Michael WinnKeymaster
In my Red Fire Dog Year Predictions, i suggested 9-11 might become a topic for a lot of hot barking from citizens. Below is the most articulate bark to yet emerge. If there is nothing to hide, government should be happy to oblige……
MichaelSCHOLARS FOR 9/11 TRUTH PETITION
scholarsfor911truth.org
February 28, 2006http://www.scholarsfor911truth.org/petition/
TO THE MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND OF THE SENATE OF THE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT,
On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the Undersigned
Scholars for 9/11 Truth Hereby Petitions for, and hereby demands, Release of
the Following kinds of documents, video and films, and physical evidence to
the public for study by experts and scholars investigating the events of
9/11:1. Immediate release of the full Pentagon surveillance tapes, of which five
frames (only) have been released via the official ASCE report, as Judicial
Watch has also requested. We further demand release of the video tape seized
by FBI agents minutes after the Pentagon hit, from the fuel service station
near the Pentagon, as well as any other videotape which shows the 9/11
strike on the Pentagon.See:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/12/1211_wirepentagon.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/2000/b05012000_bt218-00.html
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May2000/20005022a.jpg
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/jpdesm/pentagon/pages-en/fct-videos.html2. Immediate release of 6,899 photographs and 6,977 segments of video
footage held by NIST, largely from private photographers, regarding the
collapses of WTC buildings on 9/11/2001 (NIST, 2005, p. 81). In particular,
all footage relating to the collapse of WTC 7 (including shots before,
during and after the collapse) must be released immediately, without waiting
for the NIST report on WTC 7, which is long overdue and may be prolonged
indefinitely.3. An explanation from Vice President Richard Cheney regarding the “orders”
described by Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta in his testimony
before The 9/11 Commission. Secretary Mineta stated that while in an
underground bunker at the White House, he watched Vice President Cheney
castigate a young officer for asking, as a plane drew closer and closer to
the Pentagon, “Do the orders still stand?” The officer should be identified
and allowed to testify at a deposition under oath.See:
http://www.911truthmovement.org/video/hamilton_win.wmv
4. The documents generated by Vice President Cheney’s energy task force have
been kept from the public. A court case brought forth a few maps that
display oil fields in the Middle East. We hereby put Congress on notice that
there is probable cause with regard to criminal activities by the Cheney
Energy Task Force involving a criminal conspiracy to launch illegal wars
and/or terrorist activities. We therefore demand that Energy Task Force
document that comprise, discuss, or refer to plans to invade the Middle
East, including Iran, and Venezuela or other sovereign nations be released
immediately.See Cheney v. District Court 542 U.S. 367 (2004) and United States v. Nixon
418 U.S. 683 (1974).See:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=33642
5. Audio tapes of interviews with air traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11
were intentionally destroyed by crushing the cassette by hand, cutting the
tape into little pieces, and then dropping the pieces in different trash
cans around the building. We demand an explanation for this destruction of
evidence and ask that the possible existence of other copies of such tapes
or perhaps of written transcripts of the interviews be pursued. All air
traffic controllers on-duty on 9/11 should be allowed to testify during a
public forum under oath.See:
http://query.nytimes.com archive
http://web.archive.org suntimes cst-nws-tape07.html6. The Secret Service, which is highly trained to protect the President from
danger and to move him to a secure location in the event of a threat,
breached its own standard procedures by allowing President Bush to remain at
a public location for 25 minutes after it was known that the nation was
under attack. All Secret Service personnel who were at Booker Elementary
School with President Bush on 9/11 should be required to testify in public
and under oath about these events.See:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121331&page=1
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/IMAGES/feral_press_9-10.gif
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/bushbook.mov7. On the morning of 9/11, some five “war games” or “terror drills” were
being conducted by U.S. defense agencies, including one “live fly” exercise
employing aircraft. These drills reportedly included the injection of false
radar blips onto the screens of air traffic controllers. In addition, the
government was running a simulation of a plane crashing into a building the
morning of 9/11. Who was in charge of coordinating these war games and
terror drills? Who had the ability to issues orders in relation to their
conduct? On which screens were “false radar blips” inserted? When did such
false injects commence? When were they purged from the controllers’ screens?
What was the effect of these activities on standard procedures for
interdicting hijacked aircraft?See:
http://www.911readingroom.org article_id=92
http://www.fromthewilderness.com Mckinney_transcript.shtml
http://www.spiegltech.com McKinney2.rm
(6 minutes, 12 seconds into the video)
http://www.boston.com 0903_plane_exercise.htm8. It has been reported that the FBI long ago found three of four “black
boxes” from the two airplanes which hit the Twin Towers, yet has
consistently denied that they were ever found. Their data would be of the
greatest importance to understanding the events of 9/11. This matter must be
investigated and the data they provide released to the public.See:
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/extra/archives/001139.html
http://www.counterpunch.org/lindorff12202005.htmlFor each of the four sites under investigation, the 9/11 Commission reported
that two Boeing 757s, and two Boeing 767s (FAA, Part 121, airliners) owned
by United Airlines and American Airlines were hijacked by novice pilots and
were subsequently crashed, resulting in an unimaginable loss of life.
Approximately 3,000 people died the morning of 9/11 as the direct result of
these officially reported hijackings and subsequent crashes.These four scheduled airliners were reported to have carried a total of 266
passengers and crew members, which, under FAA and NTSB regulations, demands
a comprehensive investigation of the primary and contributing causes of
each. In the case of suspected criminal foul play, the NTSB would normally
assign the lead investigative role to the FBI, with assistance of
investigators from the NTSB and FAA. A comprehensive investigation of each
aircraft crash is not a regulatory option: they would have been mandatory.
Therefore, we demand public release of each comprehensive crash
investigation report, including access to all physical evidence that was
required to have been collected and secured at a suitable facility. Such
evidence should have included a large assortment of indestructible parts,
including landing gears, surface actuators, engines, black boxes, and so on.
The serialized parts would be invaluable in identifying each aircraft and,
contrary to some reports, could not have “vaporized” upon impact.Considering the enormous loss of life and financial collateral damage, if no
crash investigations were conducted, who made the decision to disregard the
FAA, Part 121, regulatory requirement? In the absence of the Part 121
investigation reports, the identity of the responsible authorities who made
the decision not to investigate must be released, and they should be made
immediately available for deposition under oath.9. In the weeks before 9/11, the US Stock market showed rather high levels
of activity on companies that would subsequently be affected by the attacks.
The afternoon before the attack, alarm bells were sounding over trading
patterns in stock options. A jump in United Air Lines some 90 times (not 90
percent) above normal between September 6 and September 10, for example, and
285 times higher than average the Thursday before the attack, have been
reported. A jump in American Airlines put options 60 times (not 60 percent)
above normal the day before the attacks has also been reported. No similar
trading occurred on any other airlines appear to have occurred.Between September 6-10, 2001, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw
suspicious trading on Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley, two of the largest
WTC tenants. An average of 3,053 put options in Merrill Lynch were bought
between Sept. 6-10, compared to an average of 252 in the previous week.
Merrill Lynch, another WTC tenant, saw 12,215 put options bought between
Sept. 7-10, whereas the previous days had seen averages of 212 contracts a
day. According to Dylan Ratigan of Bloomberg News: “This would be the most
extraordinary coincidence in the history of mankind, if it was a
coincidence. This could very well be insider trading at the worst, most
horrific, most evil use youve ever seen in your entire life. Its
absolutely unprecedented.”On September 18, 2001, the BBC reported: “American authorities are
investigating unusually large numbers of shares in airlines, insurance
companies and arms manufacturers that were sold off in the days and weeks
before the attacks. They believe that the sales were by people who knew
about the impending disaster”.According to the London Independent, October 10, 2001: “To the embarrassment
of investigators, it has also emerged that the firm used to buy many of the
‘put’ options — where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall — on
United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by ‘Buzzy’ Krongard, now
executive director of the CIA.”See:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1549909.stm
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/story.jsp?story=99402The 9/11 Commission, after looking into the pre-9/11 stock trades, never
denied their unusual nature. Instead, the Commission declared that al-Qaeda
did not conduct the trades, and asked no further questions.See amazon.com David Ray Griffin’s book
Who, if not al-Qaeda, performed the incriminating trades? This information
exists, it can be easily obtained, and it needs to be made public. Moreover,
illegal money transfers may have been processed through computers housed at
the World Trade Center before the planes crashed into the Twin Towers on
9/11. We demand a disclosure of the source of the put options and that this
whole sordid affair receive a complete and public investigation.See:
http://www.rediff.com/money/2001/dec/17wtc.htm
http://archives.cnn.com/2001/TECH/industry/12/20/wtc.harddrives.idg/10. Eyewitness testimony and a substantiating photographic record suggest
that a large sample of slag from the World Trade Center is being held at
Hangar 17 of the John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York City.
Access to the slag sample should be made available to appropriate physicists
in order to conduct non-destructive X-ray Fluorescence tests and other forms
of examination, which should reveal evidence of the cause of the collapse of
the Twin Towers. Based on these tests, we further demand two small samples
(about the size of a fist) be extracted from this large piece for further
scientific analysis.See:
http://911proof.com/resources/Slag+Sample.gif
11. Release of a complete inventory of the plane wreckage and debris from
flights 11, 77, 93 or 175 or any other aircraft that crashed or was
destroyed on September 11, 2001, including, but not limited to:(a) the location (whether warehouses or otherwise) of all such items;
(b) a catalog of photographs and videotapes taken of any and all such items;
and(c) a list of all tests and examinations concerning any and all such items,
including reports of such tests or examinations.12. Release of a complete inventory of any steel, other metal or other
material from the World Trade Centers, including, but not limited to:(a) the location (whether warehouses or otherwise) of all such items;
(b) a catalog of photographs and videotapes taken of any and all such items;
and(c) a list of all tests and examinations concerning any and all such items,
including reports of such tests or examinations.On behalf of the People of the United States of America, we demand that the
cover-up in this case end and that the kinds of documents, video and films,
and physical evidence described above be provided to the public for experts
and scholars to evaluate and assess in their efforts to expose falsehoods
and reveal truths about events on 9/11.FOR THE SOCIETY:
James H. Fetzer, Ph.D.
Founder and Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 TruthSteven E. Jones, Ph.D.
Co-Chair
Scholars for 9/11 Truth28 February 2006
March 4, 2006 at 11:43 am #11234Soaring Spirit FeatherParticipantThe whole 911 “Truth” search is full of potholes and false trails.
if you want two very grounded 911 sites:
http://911review.com/index.htmland sister site:
http://911research.wtc7.net/re911/welcome.htmlexcerpt from 911review… be careful what you are spreading…
the ScholarsFor911Truth.org is purposeful confusion to an otherwise clear message….
————————————————–
ScholarsFor911Truth.orgThe website ScholarsFor911Truth.org illustrates, perhaps better than any website, how disinformation both exploits and neutralizes some of the best work of 9/11 Truth researchers and activists. The website presents several potent assets:
* The scholarly and meticulous work of members Steven Jones and David Griffin.
* The impressive list of Scholars For 9/11 Truth members, including such distinguished contributors to the 9/11 Truth cause as Kevin Ryan, Don Paul, Andreas Von Buelow, Robert M. Bowman, Kevin Barrett, Ian Woods, and Victoria Ashley.
* The concept of a group of scholars bringing together their expertise to challenge the government’s account — a first in the history of the 9/11 Truth Movement.However, through the energetic spokespersonship of James Fetzer, ScholarsFor911Truth.org exploits these assets to increase its profile and thereby promote the Pentagon no-jetliner theory featured on its “Resources” page.
The association of the junk science typified by the ScholarsFor911Truth.org’s resources page with the competent work of Jones and Griffin featured on the home page functions both to advance the former, and discredit the latter through association. In an essay examining ScholarsFor911Truth.org, Jim Hoffman concludes that the website may sabotage the work of Steven Jones.
e x c e r p t
title: ScholarsFor911Truth.org: Muddling the Evidence
authors: Jim Hoffman… Because of the importance of the flawed ScholarsFor911Truth.org website, that may happen despite the good intentions and excellent credentials of many of the group’s members.
In late-2005, people looking into Steven Jones’ work would be directed to his paper on the Brigham Young University website. Now, people are directed to ScholarsFor911Truth.org, which mixes the scholarly work of Steven Jones and David Griffin with unscientific, sensationalist, and even offensive material. In the context of the flawed ScholarsFor911Truth.org website, Jones’ work will be much easier to dismiss as the product of a group of “conspiracy theorists.”
March 6, 2006 at 9:17 pm #11236spongebobParticipantMichael,
You know i love you and have enormous repsect for you as a teacher and friend. How many 50-year-olds can you sit on the steps outside a 7-11 with slurping soda and eating ice cream, laughing about sex and death and transformation?
so it is with great jest and some seriousness that i have to say i havent bought into the fire dog exposes yet. Almost none of this is making the mainstream media, the American people dont care enough to push it, no one’s indicting anyone in the Bush administartin, and there are load so fo flakes giving false or misinformation about 9-11. the woodwards and bernsteins are no more. journalists are a bunch of wussy-fags nowadays. evn when bob woodward does write a compelling investigative report these days, no one notices, nothing gets done.
If the Dems win the house this year, we might, MIGHT, see some serious action taken on this. perhaps to seek justice, that is, balance the cosmic and earthly qi, we can thru our practice help initiate this in the qi field. but i remain skeptical that we as a public will ever get to the real truth of this matter. it will remain written in the akasha for those who can access this cosmic record.
March 6, 2006 at 11:57 pm #11238VCraigPParticipantSpongebob Thorny Pants.
I concur.
Perhaps it is still early in the game.
I sure know the folks on AirAmerica are fighting a good fight.On the other hand, even over there I feel like they are not all really saying everything that can be said.
Lots of talk still about this administrations stupidity, incompetence and etc.
I reject all of that. They have an agenda, they are working it without any regard to what people think.Your point is well taken. Can a large enough portion of the sleeping population wake up to what is really going on? Who still draws breath who appreciates what a true democracy is and how far we have steered from that? Even if the Fire dog barks who is gong to listen to it above the din of the propaganda and disinformation?
If 9-11 can be compared to the dymanics of Pearl Harbor, who really saw it for what it was 5 years later? Who really sees it for what it was today?
But, perhaps this external BS is all just a sideshow distracting from our real task.
Cultivate your stable internal presence and let the world be as it is.Craig
March 12, 2006 at 7:41 am #11240Michael WinnKeymaster911 LOOSE CHANGE 2ND EDITION WITH EXTRA FOOTAGE
By Phil Jayhan and Korey Rowe
1 hr 21 min 50 sec
February 5, 2005http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8260059923762628848&q=loose+change
http://www.loosechange911.com
…………“This is the best damn 9-11 documentary out there.”
— Dave vonKleist, Producer of “911:In Plane Site”
Loose Change is an extremely hard hitting, heavily referenced documentary.
It has the best footage that I have seen to date, of all the bombs and
explosions going off at the World Trade Center. He covers each individual
aspect of 9/11 in keen detail, and after watching ‘Loose Change’ it is
almost impossible to walk away and not believe that 9/11 was engineered, not
by Osama, but by our own Government.Heres a quote from Tom Flocco regarding Dylan Avery’s brand new 911
documentary:“…The best packaged DVD footage for sharing actual TV coverage and
interviews shown only once during WTC / Pentagon attacks — evidence
strangely removed from repeat broadcasts …striking visual and narrative
analysis–shown frame by frame –pointing to government-linked mass murder
and a new Pearl Harbor …every school class should see!“Loose Change 2nd Edition” is the follow-up to the most provocative 9-11
documentary on the market today.This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, 2001
and the United States government.Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important,
Americans who suffered through that tragic day.It is the duty of every American to view this film!
March 16, 2006 at 10:32 am #11242macksackParticipantoops,well,,let’s take a looksee at STOPANIMALID.ORG. then, let us mosey on over to NONAIS., and for a final greatgrand finale,why not looklisten to last nite ‘s COASTTOCOAST program[3-15],regarding the same subject matter.
March 18, 2006 at 7:56 am #11244IOParticipantGo and see the magnificent “V for Vendetta” and sit back and enjoy all the great allegories provided! Especially the one on 9-11.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.