Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Food for Thought: a Corruption of the USA into a Corporate Exhaust System
- This topic has 8 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by ribosome777.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 20, 2013 at 5:27 pm #40413ribosome777Participant
key factors:
1) Obama-care to be routinely sabotaged by “49’ers” move- company drops 25 full time to 49 part time to avoid cost
2) actual penalty paid by company for NOT providing a full’timer health care: $1/hr
3) new 49’er wage (possibly prev. ~8/hr) now fed min. 7.25
4) wage per week for new “49’er” boot camp: 181.25/wk before taxes, roughly 600.00/mnth after taxes still no healthcare
5) cost for employee with penalty at full time level which the company didn’t want to pay: 8.25 per hour
6) half all unemployed have “college degree”
7) half of all “recent” college grads unemployed
8) primary attack of corporations against applicants to argue low pay–> “unskilled” / “not worth it”
9) primary argument against corps.–> no training, exploitation, treated as disposable
10) ESC guidelines for resume/CV: I) average career 3-5 years max II) different resume tailored for each employer III) read time of resume 10 seconds max IV) exploitation of keywords for inter-department filtering
11) factor many americans unaware of: regardless of implementation, Labor Unions are a proto-typical construct of US Federal Law enacted to protect their well being
12) USA one of the lowest in unionization in the world
13) USA unemployment higher in 1983
waste. pollution. disrespect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_comparisons_of_labor_unions
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/a4/US_Unemployment_1890-2008.gif
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_unionwhy aren’t businesses collaborating with Unions? b/c the skills gap is a LIE:
NY Times:
March 20, 2013 at 6:28 pm #40414StevenModeratorThat about sums it up.
Every year there is more and more polarization.March 21, 2013 at 5:58 pm #40416ribosome777Participant– repetitive argument of false neutrality versus necessary polarization
– condition of ground floor
– reality of dolmen function from perspective of heliosphere
– service of “666” beast code
– evolution driven by meat consumption (brain hack incisors)99% to 1 = 1% to 99 apex incisor mode
capacity for logic/ratio –> live long and prosper
March 23, 2013 at 7:17 am #40418c_howdyParticipantThe ecological footprint is a measure of human demand on the Earth’s ecosystems. It is a standardized measure of demand for natural capital that may be contrasted with the planet’s ecological capacity to regenerate. It represents the amount of biologically productive land and sea area necessary to supply the resources a human population consumes, and to assimilate associated waste. Using this assessment, it is possible to estimate how much of the Earth (or how many planet Earths) it would take to support humanity if everybody followed a given lifestyle. For 2007, humanity’s total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.5 planet Earths; that is, humanity uses ecological services 1.5 times as quickly as Earth can renew them. Every year, this number is recalculated to incorporate the three-year lag due to the time it takes for the UN to collect and publish statistics and relevant research.
Although the term ecological footprint is widely used and well known, it goes beyond the metaphor. It represents an accounting system for biocapacity that tracks how much biocapacity there is, and how much biocapacity people use. Calculation methods have converged thanks to standards released in 2006 and updated in 2009.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_footprintSorry, it’s about competition in my opinion.
HOWDY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w8l1ob9q4Q (holyimam)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZCm9o-9Ukc (pimpparauta)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj2wTl8OsY0(zaharoff)March 23, 2013 at 1:30 pm #40420StevenModeratorI think competition could be curtailed a bit . . .
March 23, 2013 at 6:22 pm #40422ribosome777Participant(non-commercial contemplation only)
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-vQYqaPrCj_eGZHODQ2R0U2SVE/edit?usp=sharing
Model for Migration coinciding with a 5th Dimensional Nervous System:
-the future is able to embed (and communicate) within the past to the extent that sequential constructions are able to reconnect the circuitry from which they originated
– to the extent that a node reconnects, by circum-rotation and twining, with an origin 5-space centriole
it has thereby connected, by degree, with the future..
which is itself the resolution of 4-space progression
allowing reverse flow backwards into the “volving” itself
each 5 space node harmonically connects by same degree within 4 space resonance…
acceleration of angular compression into origin nucleus tends to neutralize and release by overflow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_torus
for the case of an organism bound within helio-spheres, the solar nuclei themselves, by output buffer, allow the organism to turn inside out through the collective entity’s transport stream (“ajna” uplink)
whereas in the case of the post-terrestrial organism, it is the gravitational relay frame (con-stellated vector) itself which serves as collective neural bank
to the ends of embedded con-telligence
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Wuxing_en.svg/500px-Wuxing_en.svg.png
basis for Wu Xing Organ counter-cycling (nesting the 5D overself field):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wu_Xing
generation cycle reverses—> earth calms heart, fire purifies wood, wood develops water, water erodes stone, metal cleanses earth
twining–> heart nests to leaf/liver, liver/leaf enfolds kidneys, stomach revolves leaf, fire/water reverse
(pupa cocooning)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0a/Papilio_xuthus_Larva_2011-10-15.jpg
March 23, 2013 at 6:35 pm #40424ribosome777ParticipantMarch 26, 2013 at 10:25 am #40426c_howdyParticipantTo my knowledge, Dee and Kelley never used the word Enochian to describe the system of magick they received between April 10 and July 13, 1584. Throughout their actions, they simply referred to it as angelic. We cannot, however, be faulted too badly attaching the biblical patriarch’s name to the system. The magician’s were told that this was the magick given by God to Enoch (the seventh man from Adam) in the form of a book and Enoch (before he ascended bodily into the presence of God) passed it on to others. Over the generations the book fell into wicked hands, and God caused it to be lost. But because of Dee’s piety and prayers, God was moved to once again deliver it to mankind.
-LON MILO DUQUETTE, Enochian Vision Magick-An Introduction and Practical Guide to the Magick of Dr. John Dee and Edward KelleyOne advisor had suggested the discontinuation of the whole project. His motive was that a California group sensationally engaged in the practice of Satanism had appropriated and published the Enochian rituals or Calls in a so-called Satanic Bible. Because of this, it was felt that there were now undesirable contacts associated with the rituals that could only lead to chaos and confusion.
The author of this debased volume had made enough changes in the various Calls to rule out any likelihood of confusion with those presented here in their original form. Wherever the word God is used, the author had substituted the name of Satan or one of the equivalent terms in its stead. The same holds true for several other pieces of similar stupidity.
-ISRAEL REGARDIE, from his introduction to Aleister Crowleys The Vision and the Voice (L418)The evil demon, sometimes referred to as the evil genius, is a concept in Cartesian philosophy. In his 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes hypothesized the existence of an evil demon, a personification who is “as clever and deceitful as he is powerful, who has directed his entire effort to misleading me.” The evil demon presents a complete illusion of an external world, including other minds, to Descartes’ senses, where in fact there is no such external world in existence. The evil genius also presents to Descartes’ senses a complete illusion of his own body, including all bodily sensations, when in fact Descartes has no body. Most Cartesian scholars opine that the evil demon is also omnipotent, and thus capable of altering mathematics and the fundamentals of logic.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_demonA theodicy (pron.: /θiːˈɒdɪsi/ from Greek theos “god” + dike “justice”) is an attempt to resolve the evidential problem of evil by reconciling the traditional divine characteristics of omnibenevolence, omnipotence, and omniscience with the occurrence of evil or suffering in the world. Unlike a defense, which tries to demonstrate that God’s existence is logically possible in the light of evil, a theodicy provides a framework which claims to make God’s existence probable. The term was coined in 1710 by German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his work, Théodicée, though various responses to the problem of evil had been previously proposed. The British philosopher John Hick traced the history of theodicy in his work, Evil and the God of Love, identifying two major traditions: the Augustinian theodicy, based on the writings of Augustine of Hippo, and the Irenaean theodicy, which Hick developed, based on the thinking of St Irenaeus. Other philosophers have suggested that theodicy is a modern discipline because deities in the ancient world were often imperfect.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheodicyChristian right is a term used in the United States to describe right-wing Christian political groups that are characterized by their strong support of socially conservative policies. Christian conservatives principally seek to apply their understanding of the teachings of Christianity to politics and public policy by proclaiming the value of those teachings and/or by seeking to use those teachings to influence law and public policy.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_rightSorry again for all these citations.
And sorry because this thread somehow starts to look quite messy.
My question is still from where one should look teachings in “ultimate form?”
For Enochian for example, is it DuQuette, Crowley, Lavey or somebody else?
And is it anyway beneficial to share it, especially if it comes from suprahuman source?
HOWDY
March 26, 2013 at 9:49 pm #40428ribosome777Participant(…)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.