Nnonnth

>>this physical realm is nothing more than some transient distraction that we must transcend as soon as possible.<>i suppose to those who are hellbent on screwing this planet, all i can say is ‘forgive them lord, they know not what they do'<<

You and I are amongst those people, it's everyone in the industrialized world that's doing it!

Just…[Read more]

>>It felt pretty grounded.<>I am suprised that a mystic talked nothing of prayer.<>Indead the old way is to try to change things just in the physical realm but this is not a holistic approach.<>What have all the masters told us to do? The potential for a peacful earth is already there, we choose to go in that direction or not.<>I do not know how…[Read more]

I was introduced to the properties of sea salt by a magical practice, and found that it has more properties than purely physical as well.

How stupid we are! The ingredients for a perfect life all around, and we just dump rubbish all over them…

best NN

For your words.

Of *course* you are correct about never giving up! Did I really seem to be advocating that? – my attitude is the complete opposite…

Giving up on humanity? On the earth?

NEVER!

But giving up on this particular industrial civilization and the idea of its indefinite existence?

Giving up on the fantasy of infinite…[Read more]

– this is from the essay I linked to in my previous post – should be read in full, but what do you say to this bit Alexander?

>>>

Some people may claim that such proposals are morally repugnant because they accept the unacceptable. These criticisms miss the point. Drivers do everything they can to avoid a crash, but there are situations in…[Read more]

… are you suggesting that raising consciousness will somehow manufacture more oil? Food? Stop the icecaps melting? This ‘new earth’ you speak of is not a *physical* place. The physical earth is where we are, and it is here that the changes will occur. The lives of many people will be lost, ruined, changed radically… do you suggest that the…[Read more]

Hi Nei Dan –

Just happened to stumble upon this passage written by Thomas Higgins, student of Draja Mickaharic, in the latter’s “More Magical Techniques”. This is part of a larger section on summoning in general, very good basic instructions – although again I must stress you need to prepare lengthily before trying work like this in practice. I…[Read more]

>>Everyone is now, always has been,always will be immortal<<

– Michael, Feb 2005!

Naturally the remark is taken out of context. But it simply reveals the extent to which we are willing to stand for or against forms of words rather than truths. I am not implying hypocrisy or untruth on Michael's or anyone else's part. This is just the nature…[Read more]

>>If I use my “heart and your conscience and your bliss” to make a decision on this subject im afraid it will largley be based on my old knowledge(Catholicism) of this subject. I’m am not Catholic anymore and no longer subscribe to its dogma.<>All I know about demons is based on what I learned from Catholicism. Which again, is why im re-educating…[Read more]

>>My ideas of a demons comes from my childhood teachings of Catholicism.<<

Well with due respect that may be the problem!

Alot of the things called demons are simply things religions have no use for. That does not mean they are 'evil'.

I think instead of recommending more books and blah di blah, I would just say follow your heart and your…[Read more]

>>How about if I said to you, Nnonnth, do you wave a little magic wand that you wave casting spells? Is that also an opinion or is it being ignorant of another spiritual path? I think one should know what’s what before he starts making condescending statements like that.<>The picture I get here is that you have alot of faith in Michael<>This is…[Read more]

Look here for example –

>>I found it very insulting to Buddhist thought when he said, “Mat, are you there or are you just an illusion”.<>We have previously agreed that ALL paths include some sort of stilling of the mind as a preparation at the very least. Michael’s “Daoism” does not include that.<>I see all paths as one when they lead one to…[Read more]

OK I think there is a little over-sensitivity here!

>>When I see someone voices their opinion that Daoism has more free will, Buddism aims at suicide of the self, etc.<>If Michael agreed with Bagua and Max, for example, then he would commence Buddhist meditation at once.<>I apologize to you Nnonnth for “attempting to persaude you into my way as…[Read more]

– recently recommended by Max. In this book a lineage taoist master heals a village of cholera by means of a sigil, and does various other ‘magics’. I have also mentioned my favourite writer on western magic, Draja Mickaharic, and his healing practices and so forth. I myself have have done entity work and will do so again I expect. The objections…[Read more]

What we are really talking about is addiction on the part of traditionalist practitioners to traditional forms of WORDING about spiritual development, which causes argument by sticking to wordings – not because of ‘correctness’ or ‘incorrectness’.

Every time the wording itself is *actually discussed* the Buddhist wording starts to admit itself…[Read more]

– and I DEFINITELY prefer the new to the old. NN

Hiya, just found an unexpected computer where I am, wanted to quickly reply to this post in particular.

>>that is exactly what seems so strange to me about this “false self” language, that it seems based upon a kind of erroneous projection outside of the living, human experience<>how could such an natural creative intelligence “reject” its own…[Read more]

– this morning I looked over some old forum stuff from the days of Plato, Max, and everything. Ye gods! If I’d’ve known the history here, I never would’ve tried to bridge the divide.

I have to take a break from the forum for a while – back in a couple of months.

So llonngth! Nnonnth is ggonnth!

NN