-
Steven replied to the topic The seeker in the forum General 17 years, 7 months ago
Where do you live? There may be a Healing Tao instructor nearby
that you can connect with–if not for a workshop, just a short
private session to show you a few basic exercises you can do.
For instance, Deep Earth Pulsing would be a very good exercise
for your situation, but it is difficult to describe via text.Also, keep practicing…[Read more]
-
Steven replied to the topic History of relations between Taoism and Buddhism? in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
-
Steven replied to the topic History of relations between Taoism and Buddhism? in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
Fantastic . . .
Lots of big news to come soon in an updated Practice Log . . .
How about you?
S
-
Steven replied to the topic History of relations between Taoism and Buddhism? in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
-
Steven replied to the topic Qijong-micro cosmic orbit-meditations.. how exactly can it harm? in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
There’s a risk with anything you do in life of course, but
certain things have serious risks, while others have almost none.Sexual energy risks you know about, but . . .
There is *very little* to worry about with
the Inner Smile, Six Healing Sounds, and Microcosmic Orbit.
They are designed to be safe, and moreover are used
in other…[Read more] -
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
Sexual energy, i.e. jing chi, originates from the kidneys,
which corresponds to water. The quality of water
is that it has a tendency to cool off and contract when it doesn’t
move. Since time has passed since you brought the sexual energy to your head, it has cooled. Moreover, earth chi has a cooling quality to it, and by
connecting to…[Read more] -
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
>>What I did today is I walked out of the house and enjoyed a small
>>walking trip on the leafy areas of my town. The tingly chi disappears
>>whenever I move. When I stop there is only a faint hum in my feet.This is because you are grounding your chi through your feet.
>>Seems like it is fruitless to do all this venting and bringing…[Read more]
-
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
The reason why it is less when you are sitting instead of lying down, is
because you have a stronger connection to the Earth, and it is easier to
ground . . . strongest grounding happens when you stand.See Dog’s advice.
S
-
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
>>Seems like you know alot Steven, you a master? ;>
Thank you for your compliment, but I’m still a student.
S
-
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
Nothing wrong with using the back channel to bring it down, if that’s
easier for you.It takes time to get sexual energy out of areas where you got it stuck . . .
Sometimes a lot of time!Also keep in mind that if you’ve brought the sexual chi to your head many
times, that you may have opened up a pathway there, so that even if
you…[Read more] -
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
With geodesic preservation only, there is no problem with
the AB@BC definition.Here’s an idea for your situation with AB@CD:
Consider parallel translations of CD to arcs BE . . .
You *may* have an issue with uniqueness of parallel translation,
depending on how the parallel translation is done.Recommendation: consider variations…[Read more]
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
Yes, this is why I was making such a big deal about the
length-minimizing feature. You wanted to use “arc multiplication”
to generalize the notion of complex numbers and quaternions in a
new way.To be well-defined, I wanted to know what properties you wanted to
carry over into the generalization . . .S
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
AC is not a length-minimizing geodesic anymore necessarily;
you get a geodesic, but not a length-minimizing one.This is the source of the well-defined problem.
If all you care about is geodesic preservation, then fine.
Products of the form AB@BC are defined in *that* case, but
then your comment that the products AB@BC represent…[Read more] -
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
In my example of the two arcs on the same geodesic path, you can’t
force the continuity. If you are restricting to SHORTEST geodesic,
the path will instantaneously switch once the other geodesic option
becomes the shortest path.If you are making a definition in terms of arcs, then I think
you have to define it locally in a manifold sense.S
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
This is different and this is something you can do, but . . .
However, in this case, all you are really doing is giving
“different names” to the generators of SO(4), because you
are just using the SO(4) multiplication structure on these
new names.S
-
Steven replied to the topic Geometrical Interpretation of Quaternions&MULTIPLICATION in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
>>When you move continually from B to C,
>>being at time t in the point X[t] on the arc BC,
>>the resulting product AB@BX[t] changes also continually from AB to AC.
>>This is a usual normal well-definition of the path AC.But this is exactly the problem. In my example, there are two legitimate
definitions of AC. If you want to force…[Read more] -
Steven replied to the topic I have been practicing Chia's Multiorgasmic man in the forum General 17 years, 8 months ago
- Load More
