October 1, 2008 at 3:24 pm #29268
I think we all realize that changing the environment only does so much, and a over reliance on external guidance or assistance can weaken ones internal guidance. But I still enjoy dreaming about different ways of structuring environments. My topic relates greatly to the metal element with its ability to change and hold shape yet maintain its quality of gold and to create a flexible cauldron space. So I invite you to dream with me on what the American cauldron space might look like. Side note 9/11 could be seen as the old metal structure breaking away to allow a restructuring of America, or a rebirthing. Note also that weakening our opponent is some times the best thing for them.
The first institution I would like to look at is that of corporations. Some say regulate them some say leave them alone to fail or succeed. I do not like either of these options. I first would like to put corporation in a better context. One by having people look at America as a corporation or corporations as governments. It really is two words for the same thing. Often when people talk about a secret government, they really are talking about out in the open corporate/banking cartels that have cooperated most of the time to maintain status quo. That is to say fight change vs create adaptability. As change is perceived as death because of a unrefined metal element that holds most peoples elements in compartmentalized structures of egotism. This pattern did not start in America it is old but I believe it did come here to be processed and harmonized. The new model in the future weather it is our immune system or our national defense system will be one of harmonization not defense or rejection. This model served us in the past but we will move on like one moves from the healing sounds to fusion ect. It is part of our advancement and evolution, like one that has been working with the healing sounds and is now called to move on to fusion. Notice the restructuring going from the pentagram or pentagon (national defense) to the fusion of the cross or obelisk/pyramid formation. I personally do not see the wisdom in granting incorporation to groups that do not up hold the agreements of free speech, human rights, and accountability to the people. Ask your self do you want the internet service provided by an institution that has free speech written into their social contract or one that has only has a social contract to create the greatest money for its majority share holders. Would you like the internet service provider to live in your area use the same internet, and be accountable to you, or a service provider that lives nowhere near you maybe not even in the same country, and is totally un accountable to you. Do you think you would have more of a say in a town of a couple thousand in which you got to elect the head of your service provider or as one voice to a multinational organization? Winston a small town here in North Carolina just did this they tried the old way but Time Warner and others refused to provide them with fiber optic even if the tax payers where willing to pay. So they kicked them out and now have the cheapest fastest free speech protected internet in the state maybe the country. In the case of corporations I would un-incorporate every last one of them. I find them to be psychotic by the nature of their structure (see wonderful movie bellow), and the act of incorporation should be reserved for new States Counties and Towns. Not that no sate county town is the same government or people or laws yet there is common ground in virtues like acceptance, and honesty. This is adaptability. If we hold to simple virtues at the federal level (a level of slow change and common ground a ground of honesty trust and acceptance) we can empower more functional complexity at the state and county levels. Let the people decide what level of services they wish to have from their towns and counties but keep those services in house or only deal with individuals not separate corporations. May we create peace in our own inner cooperation, to be reflected outwardly.
This is part one my next post will be on banking intuitions aka the service of providing money to facilitate trade or a failed system of bartering.October 2, 2008 at 12:08 am #29269
Also note that when most people say privatization they mean putting control of a service or resource under the control of a corporation which in our case means putting what was owned and operated by the American corporation beholden to the people with elected officials by the people, under control by I would say a competing corporation not beholden to the people of that area. Most people that fight for privatization are also major Patriots but they lack the understanding that they are often working for competing governments, and serving a master that is anti American. If you truly want privatization have private owner ship aka owned by one human being accountable to the American people but also free from physical oppression by the masses. I will say I have never seen a society tribal to feudal that like one person owning major natural resource so we may not want that privatized.October 10, 2008 at 12:07 pm #29271
You need to provide summaries for these video links.
Personally, I don’t have time to watch 3 hour videos.
Your high level of enthusiasm has inspired me though.
You may be the right person. See the news video.
SOctober 10, 2008 at 4:23 pm #29273
Nice. That was great. I will keep to my breams and let others work the politics.
I will try to summarize long movies in the future. I will try not to color the films with to much of my own perspective. Any of the films I post can bee taken in little bits like a good long book. It is what I do. I eat little bits and really chew what people have cooked.
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.