Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Electric Car Coolness! & Lithium is looking Even Better!
- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 14 years, 9 months ago by Steven.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 20, 2010 at 3:21 pm #33362DogParticipant
Lithium-Ion Battery Life Could Reach 20 Years
Chris Brandrick
Feb 5, 2010 1:54 pm
Japanese research and development firm Eamex claims to have found a new way to increase the typical average life of a high-capacity lithium-ion battery. Eamex’s new technology will allow the demanding batteries to sustain over 10,000 recharges over the course of 20 years.
This rather dramatic increase in performance is made possible by new techniques such as a stabilization process of the battery’s electrodes, which in-turn puts less stress on the battery’s tin. This maintains the bonding of particles for a longer period of time and reduces the overall deterioration process. The result is a battery that lasts up to 10 times as long as most current batteries.
Lithium-ion batteries are broadly popular within various consumer electronics. They tend to hold their charge when not in use, and have a high energy-to-weight ratio. Current lithium-ion batteries can hold their charge for up to 1,000 charge cycles.
Eamex’s technology is currently designed with heavy-duty batteries in mind, such as those used in electric vehicles. However, this technology should eventually find its way into smaller devices, such as cell phones, laptops, and MP3 players.
The advantages beyond the obvious increase in battery life are also welcome, such as lower costs over time and reduced waste.
Better batteries? Bring ’em on!
February 20, 2010 at 6:54 pm #33363StevenModeratorFebruary 21, 2010 at 4:00 am #33365singing oceanParticipantI think thats why the tesla roadster could outrun a ferrari with only two gears: forward and reverse. Solid torque that doesn’t change from the second the foot hits the pedal.
February 24, 2010 at 7:24 pm #33367StevenModeratorHi Dog,
I saw this article today on wave power.
I seem to remember you had an interest in it.S
———————————–
The new wave: Harnessing the power of the ocean
By Mark Tutton, for CNN
February 24, 2010 12:35 p.m. EST(CNN) — Producing electricity using the power of the oceans could start a new wave in renewable energy. But some fear that “wave farms” could damage the livelihoods of fishermen by rendering coastal waters off limits.
Hydropower accounts for 19 percent of the world’s electricity, according to the U.S. Geological Survey, and mainly uses the power of falling water at man-made dams.
But wave power is still an untapped resource, which some believe could one day generate a tenth of the world’s renewable energy.
Off the coast of Hawaii, Ocean Power Technologies (OPT) is looking to produce electricity using the island’s famously wild surf.
The U.S. Navy is backing OPT’s research on the PowerBuoy 40 — a wave energy converter that is 16 meters high and 14 meters in diameter, most of which is submerged in the ocean.
A float on the PowerBuoy bobs up and down with the waves, working an internal plunger that is connected to a hydraulic pump. The pump drives a generator to produce electricity, which can be sent to the shore via an underwater cable. Once it’s connected to the energy grid this spring the buoy will produce 40 kilowatts (kW) of electricity — enough to power 20 to 25 homes.
Charles Donleavy, CEO of OPT, told CNN, “One of the big advantages of wave energy is it’s close to shore, and as you look around the world the majority of the world’s population is very close to shore.”
He added that wave power has advantages over other types of renewable energy.
“Sun comes and goes and during the nighttime you can’t get any solar power for your photovoltaics. Wind energy is also intermittent, but wave energy is constant and continuous.”
OPT is already working on the next generation of PowerBuoys. The PB150 is larger than the model being used in Hawaii and will generate 150kW.
Once worked is finished on the PB150 OPT says it will install several at a site off the coast of Oregon, in the northwestern United States. It says the Oregon coast has the potential to house wave farms that could produce 100 megawatts of power.
Columbia Power Technologies is another commercial wave energy company with its sights set on Oregon. It hopes its own wave energy buoy will be in the waters off Oregon in 2012.
But fishing is big business in Oregon. The Dungeness crab industry alone is worth around $80 million per year and some fear that plans for wave farms could make no-go zones of vast stretches of prime fishing waters.
Nick Furman is director of Oregon’s Dungeness crab commission.
He told CNN, “We’ve kind of accepted the fact that even though it’s prime habitat for Dungeness crab, we’re going to have to put those 10 buoys out in the water.
“Our biggest fear is that if it were to be successful, and if the development money was available, instead of fishing boats all we saw was buoys bobbing up and down.”
When it comes to harvesting the power of the oceans, buoys aren’t the only technology making waves.
In 2008, Scottish company Pelamis Wave Power opened the world’s first commercial wave farm off the coast of Agucadoura in north Portugal.
Pelamis Wave Energy Converters are made up of four tubular sections. As they move in the waves their motion is resisted by hydraulic rams, which pump high-pressure fluid through hydraulic motors, driving generators to produce up to 750kW of electricity.
Although the Agucadoura project ran into technical problems, Pelamis is now working on a new wave machine, P2, which it plans to install off Orkney, in northern Scotland.
While wave power remains relatively expensive to produce, the field is still in its infancy and prices are expected to fall as the technology develops.
Robert Paasch, director of the Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center, in the United States, told CNN, “Wave energy right now we’re estimating is around 50 cents a kilowatt hour, but what we expect to see is a curve much like we saw with wind.
“Thirty years ago wind energy cost about 50 cents a kilowatt hour and it’s now down in the seven to five cents range, where it’s competitive with a lot of carbon-based sources.”
March 5, 2010 at 10:01 pm #33369StevenModeratorHey Dog,
Saw this article and thought you’d enjoy . . .
S
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.