Food for Thought: a Corruption of the USA into a Corporate Exhaust System

That about sums it up.
Every year there is more and more polarization.

The ecological footprint is a measure of human demand on the Earth’s ecosystems. It is a standardized measure of demand for natural capital that may be contrasted with the planet’s ecological capacity to regenerate. It represents the amount of biologically productive land and sea area necessary to supply the resources a human population consumes, and to assimilate associated waste. Using this assessment, it is possible to estimate how much of the Earth (or how many planet Earths) it would take to support humanity if everybody followed a given lifestyle. For 2007, humanity’s total ecological footprint was estimated at 1.5 planet Earths; that is, humanity uses ecological services 1.5 times as quickly as Earth can renew them. Every year, this number is recalculated to incorporate the three-year lag due to the time it takes for the UN to collect and publish statistics and relevant research.
Although the term ecological footprint is widely used and well known, it goes beyond the metaphor. It represents an accounting system for biocapacity that tracks how much biocapacity there is, and how much biocapacity people use. Calculation methods have converged thanks to standards released in 2006 and updated in 2009.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_footprint

Sorry, it’s about competition in my opinion.

HOWDY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8w8l1ob9q4Q (holyimam)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZCm9o-9Ukc (pimpparauta)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wj2wTl8OsY0(zaharoff)

To my knowledge, Dee and Kelley never used the word Enochian to describe the system of magick they received between April 10 and July 13, 1584. Throughout their actions, they simply referred to it as angelic. We cannot, however, be faulted too badly attaching the biblical patriarch’s name to the system. The magician’s were told that this was the magick given by God to Enoch (the seventh man from Adam) in the form of a book and Enoch (before he ascended bodily into the presence of God) passed it on to others. Over the generations the book fell into wicked hands, and God caused it to be lost. But because of Dee’s piety and prayers, God was moved to once again deliver it to mankind.
-LON MILO DUQUETTE, Enochian Vision Magick-An Introduction and Practical Guide to the Magick of Dr. John Dee and Edward Kelley

One advisor … had suggested the discontinuation of the whole project. His motive was that a California group sensationally engaged in the practice of Satanism had appropriated and published the Enochian rituals or Calls in a so-called Satanic Bible. Because of this, it was felt that there were now undesirable contacts associated with the rituals that could only lead to chaos and confusion.
The author of this debased volume had made enough changes in the various Calls to rule out any likelihood of confusion with those presented here in their original form. Wherever the word God is used, the author had substituted the name of Satan or one of the equivalent terms in its stead. The same holds true for several other pieces of similar stupidity.
-ISRAEL REGARDIE, from his introduction to Aleister Crowley’s The Vision and the Voice (L418)

The evil demon, sometimes referred to as the evil genius, is a concept in Cartesian philosophy. In his 1641 Meditations on First Philosophy, René Descartes hypothesized the existence of an evil demon, a personification who is “as clever and deceitful as he is powerful, who has directed his entire effort to misleading me.” The evil demon presents a complete illusion of an external world, including other minds, to Descartes’ senses, where in fact there is no such external world in existence. The evil genius also presents to Descartes’ senses a complete illusion of his own body, including all bodily sensations, when in fact Descartes has no body. Most Cartesian scholars opine that the evil demon is also omnipotent, and thus capable of altering mathematics and the fundamentals of logic.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evil_demon

A theodicy (pron.: /θiːˈɒdɪsi/ from Greek theos “god” + dike “justice”) is an attempt to resolve the evidential problem of evil by reconciling the traditional divine characteristics of omnibenevolence, omnipotence, and omniscience with the occurrence of evil or suffering in the world. Unlike a defense, which tries to demonstrate that God’s existence is logically possible in the light of evil, a theodicy provides a framework which claims to make God’s existence probable. The term was coined in 1710 by German philosopher Gottfried Leibniz in his work, Théodicée, though various responses to the problem of evil had been previously proposed. The British philosopher John Hick traced the history of theodicy in his work, Evil and the God of Love, identifying two major traditions: the Augustinian theodicy, based on the writings of Augustine of Hippo, and the Irenaean theodicy, which Hick developed, based on the thinking of St Irenaeus. Other philosophers have suggested that theodicy is a modern discipline because deities in the ancient world were often imperfect.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodicy

Christian right is a term used in the United States to describe right-wing Christian political groups that are characterized by their strong support of socially conservative policies. Christian conservatives principally seek to apply their understanding of the teachings of Christianity to politics and public policy by proclaiming the value of those teachings and/or by seeking to use those teachings to influence law and public policy.
-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_right

Sorry again for all these citations.

And sorry because this thread somehow starts to look quite messy.

My question is still from where one should look teachings in “ultimate form?”

For Enochian for example, is it DuQuette, Crowley, Lavey or somebody else?

And is it anyway beneficial to share it, especially if it comes from suprahuman source?

HOWDY