Noam Chomsky paints his own cynical picture of the conflict in Iraq. The U.S. goal certainly had nothing to do with stopping atrocities, he says, and even less to do with advancing political freedom. The U.S. promotes democracy when its in our strategic and economic interests and opposes democracy when its not. Chomsky continues, Its almost inconceivable that the U.S. could permit a sovereign, democratic Iraq. The reasons are transparent. Iraq, he predicts, would form an alliance with Iran, helping foment Shiite rebellion in Saudi Arabia, leading to a Shiite alliance controlling most of the worlds energy. Even more worrisome, Iraq would rearm and develop weapons of mass destruction as a deterrent. Chomsky notes, The one thing the U.S. invasion taught everyone is you better have WMDs to protect yourself from U.S. attack. Poses Chomsky, Would the U.S. sit by and allow this? . The chances are zero. So contrary to our own messianic vision of implementing democracy, the U.S. will try to run Iraq. Chomskys alternative: pay Iraq billions in reparations for having supported Saddam Hussein, for years of painful sanctions, and hand the country over to the Iraqis as soon as possible.
the definitive collection from
arguably the most important intellectual alive
(the New York Times)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.