Home › Forum Online Discussion › Philosophy › Round 2: Dao vs Chan. WHO is attuning to the Center?
- This topic has 25 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 9 months ago by singing ocean.
-
AuthorPosts
-
March 6, 2006 at 1:55 am #11208FajinParticipant
No formulas can set you free. They will help you at the begining on your Path but that’s about it. Plus, why do you think Bagua has no experience with Taoist formulas?
*The Daoist formulas will guide you through the process of being free because they allow for maximum amount of free will, in my realization of the Dao. I did not say that Bagua has no experience with the formulas, I said that he does not buy into the whole Daoist Immortality concept about the light body or authentic self.
I can see why Bagua is sometimes frustrated to make comments to your posts, but he has the best and kindest responses I’ve read so far. I could never be so gentle.
*Our whole discussion was based on what the ego was, I was trying to state that from a Daoist perspective. I don’t know what the Buddhist perspective is. When the monkey mind is conquered by negative emotions, those will arise and it’s seen as an ego, but when all we have are positive emotions, our creative spiritual self is unleashed. There is nothing to be frustrated about this.
Fajin
March 6, 2006 at 8:59 am #11210MaxParticipantYou have an idealistic view of what Taoist alchemy is. Lets wait 5 years from now and then, if we are still around, we will have round 3. But for now, read again what Bagua said to you. He is saving you a lot of time.
March 6, 2006 at 10:34 am #11212FajinParticipantMax,
I read your earlier posts with Michael about Chan and Daoism and I couldn’t help seeing you got schooled every time. I can see that you clearly wanted me to go with that Nan Huai Chin guy as your e-mail told me all. Bagua and I learned from each other and we had an interesting discussion, so I don’t know what you’re talking about. Yes, I haven’t practiced Michael’s formulas yet, but I know alot from Daoism as compared to other paths because martial arts reflects alchemical paths.
Most of my knowledge of Daoist alchemy is from speaking to other Daoists at Wudang and this site so yes, I do have an idealistic view of it, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t know what I’m talking about.
Smiles out,
Fajin
March 6, 2006 at 12:51 pm #11214MaxParticipantI read your earlier posts with Michael about Chan and Daoism and I couldn’t help seeing you got schooled every time.
You’re too funny to think there could be a winner in this discussion. Plus you didn’t read the posts that were ‘magically’ deleted due to the ‘accidents’ by webmasters.Most of my knowledge of Daoist alchemy is from speaking to other Daoists at Wudang and this site so yes, I do have an idealistic view of it, but that doesn’t mean that I don’t know what I’m talking about.
That’s all good and it will help you on your path.
I can see that you clearly wanted me to go with that Nan Huai Chin guy as your e-mail told me all.
I wanted you to look at the whole thing with another perspective. You can read his book ‘History of Taoism’ to learn more on his view of what Taoism and Alchemy are. All I offer is help and it’s up to you to accept or reject it. There is nothing fo me to gain from this. And that’s the reason I don’t spend much time here. Takes too much time.March 6, 2006 at 1:06 pm #11216FajinParticipantYou’re too funny to think there could be a winner in this discussion. Plus you didn’t read the posts that were ‘magically’ deleted due to the ‘accidents’ by webmasters.
*Great Max, if it makes you happy.
I wanted you to look at the whole thing with another perspective. You can read his book ‘History of Taoism’ to learn more on his view of what Taoism and Alchemy are. All I offer is help and it’s up to you to accept or reject it. There is nothing fo me to gain from this. And that’s the reason I don’t spend much time here. Takes too much time.
*Not interested in Nan’s book, thank you for the offer. You don’t know very much about me, so please don’t think that you understand me and my understanding of the Dao or try and change my perspective as I’ve had a Buddhist one in the past.
And don’t bother replying back, I’m taking some time off from the Healingdao, too much time on the computer. I’ll see ya later.
Fajin
March 7, 2006 at 1:12 am #11218spongebobParticipantthe WHO is the observer. this observer i’m not really sure i can explain in daosit terms. it seems to be that part of the five shen that has already integrated.
this does not require daoist practice or any other kind of practice to take place. the shen do it spontaneously as you (they) experience life. i think a modicum of this spontaneous integratin must take place before someone even becomes interested in fulfillment.
March 7, 2006 at 12:44 pm #11220baguaParticipantHi Spongebob:
To me, in this life, the Five Shen are always integrated, but not harmonized, When they are not harmonized, one or more acts up and its unfavorable qualites manifest. Does this make sense to you?
bagua
March 8, 2006 at 11:19 am #11222JernejParticipantHuman is a pact between heaven and earth.
Many layers of it. Lesser, greater, greatest.If pact is no more on some level (either broken or fulfilled), then in that aspect there is man no more.
Unengaged polarities are left ‘in space’ of future/past life in other hearts.Heaven on earth. Many heavens on earth. In one human.
Misconceptions come from the notion that name defines the man.
Man is the heart, the flow that opens.
Name is just a shortcut to a layer of heart.
Names are polarities that are accessed.Ancestral lineage name is idea implanted after birth. For ease of ancestors. Not for ease of everything.
Try calling a human. You can call his ancestral name. But you may get attacted if call was not allinged with other parts of him.
But if you call by directly evoking his character or destiny, how can he refuse. That is him.
You can even evoke his mortality and not use his ancestral lineage name (=seduction).One can reach other human by calling to implant, evoking its character, evoking its destiny.
If one resonates with one such in other human, and then such is there no more, then it is the passion of heart that makes the move on.
Body is a consciousness, as is the spirit. Thus body is empty vessel as much as it is discarnate spirit. It is the war of sex.
March 8, 2006 at 12:04 pm #11224wendyParticipantYou and I are really from a different star system, I do my best but your use of language is so difficult for me. I try to read between the lines but again I have nothing to hold on to, wind words wind, I cannot grasp, so I have to let go. Whatever you want to communicate or to express, I can’t understand. Are you fully arrived on this planet or still wondering -wandering- what you are looking for here?
March 8, 2006 at 12:51 pm #11226JernejParticipantI am the madness of heaven bred by the earth.
Growing weight-loss and shortsightedness until found some ground.
Weird.And you are right. You can not grasp onto anything. It is the flow.
Have you ever meditated on the act on giving child its name?
Observe it carefully.
Now… can you imagine living with such human and that such name were not given…Next..Imagine going around your family doing your things, and never call them by ‘their’ (given by parents/peers) name.
‘Pierre, come to luch’=’lunch is eaten now’of course challenge is ‘hi, let’s go for a drink’ or plain call ‘Pierre!'(who is walking in front of you on the street and has not noted you)
because the intent has not yet been express. (a man wrote whole book on ‘What do you say after you say hello’)
express it first: start talking on the subject you are interested and it will naturally progress to a table with tea; or just make a scream at ‘Pierre’ with all your soul (inarticulate sound) and if there is it he will turn around.
This is quite magical.
And if she is not ‘proud woman’ which was what made your juice flow, you would have great difficulty reaching her. You would need to evoke her character and not yours.
Can you imagine doing this for whole life. Or for eternity.March 19, 2006 at 2:25 am #11228singing oceanParticipantMax,
You are being condescending and making judgements about others again. I have been practicing daoist alchemy for more than five years, and can safely say that it is the EXPERIENCE of the inner process that is why I keep practicing, not because of an idealized view of where I think I will end up, or what it should be like.
I have noticed that when I just observe, it does not activate the life force to actively harmonize in the same way.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.