Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Solar EclipseNew Moon in Scorpio on October 23rd, 2014
- This topic has 49 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 12 months ago by nomad.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 13, 2014 at 2:43 am #43192StevenModerator
>>>It’s complicated, and it’s an important issue,
>>>not just for me, but for everyone… I’ve been
>>>exploring sexuality through my male and female
>>>aspects for a while. I’ve fallen in love and lust
>>>with both women and men, and I’m angry…Thank you for this deeply personal sharing.
I’m sorry I didn’t see it earlier to be able to respond sooner.Congratulations!
You’ve been given a wonderful gift that not many are willing to admit or share.Yes, I said GIFT.
People who are born homosexual are given a gift, because in feeling sexual attraction to the gender that is “opposite to that dictated by society” (i.e. the same-sex), it allows a kind of teaching that others do not receive. It forces them to really understand the idea of love in a way that heterosexual people will likely never get. Heterosexual folks don’t need to assert themselves and express their sexual love intentions; it is implied. Those that are homosexual need to, however, if they wish to identify themselves to others for the purpose of choosing a mate . . . AND if they wish shake off the presumed assumption of heterosexuality that is forced upon them, which makes them feel as if they are not living honestly. Therefore a homosexual person needs to confront and get-to-know the whole idea of love in a much more profound way than a heterosexual person. Heterosexual people are not forced into having a personalized education about the love process; they are not forced to re-examine their feelings like a homosexual person . . . when sexual feelings arise, the reaction is slightly more unconscious. There is an old saying: “what doesn’t kill us, makes us stronger”. So while it may be a tougher lifestyle to live–I don’t think anybody disputes that–I think it creates a type of growth that heterosexual folks are missing out on. Thus being born homosexual is actually a real gift.
People who are born BISEXUAL are given an even bigger gift. Why?
In the case of someone bisexual, they are given the same gift that is given to those who are born gay, but they also are given the “standard” heterosexual attraction. Thus rather than being born into *one* world, you are given the ability to be born into two. People who are monosexual (straight or gay), each are attracted to one gender only. These means that they can only find true completion and happiness through deep sexual-love bonding, if they restrict themselves to only 50% of the population.Someone who is bisexual is not restricted in that fashion. A loving spirit who comes into your life need not be rejected because of a gender preference. Thus you are given the gift to love even MORE people in an intimate way that others do not get. This is why being bisexual is an even bigger gift.
So don’t be angry.
Instead, consider yourself LUCKY.
The universe gave you the capacity to love even more people than usual.
How wonderful!Smile and feel joy in who you are. 🙂
BTW: Sorry to hear about your experience on the sidewalk. It’s not a commentary about you; it’s a commentary about them. You should feel sorry for them that have such a narrow view of the world that a stranger that they don’t even know is somehow viewed as a perceived threat or something to ridicule. It only shows that they are on an extremely low-vibrational level, and they have a lot to learn if they are to get any genuine evolution. Remember that these are a just a few of the 8 billion some people on this planet, all destined to become dust at some point.
Hopefully my words can help you in some way . . .
Warm wishes,
StevenDecember 18, 2014 at 11:01 pm #43194Fool TurtleParticipantWhat does Jesus say?
Jesus said that *gay men and possibly trans women* were born that way. Of course, this is rough but the copy & paste text here mildly edited for brevity is interesting.
Matthew 7:1-5 Don’t judge others and you won’t be judged either. The way you judge others is the way you’re going to be judged, and the way you treat others is the way you’re going to be treated. And why do you look at the speck in someone else’s eye, but you don’t consider the log that’s in your own. You want to try and correct the way someone else lives but you don’t do anything about the way you live. You’re a hypocrite.
In ancient Roman Law, it is laid out by the Roman jurist Ulpian in a document known as Lex Julia et Papia, Book 1 (Digest 50.16.128)
“Eunuch is a general designation: the term includes those who are eunuchs by nature, as well as those who are mutilated.”
Ulpian makes a distinction between the non castrated Eunuch and the castrated Eunuch. Whole Eunuchs, who were freemen, unlike mutilated eunuchs, were eligible for marriage and for adopting children.
Josephus, in Jewish Antiquities IV 8,40, indicated that in the case of some, since “it is evident that their soul has become effeminate, they have transfused that effeminacy to their body also.”
John 8:15 You judge after the flesh; I judge no man.
Matthew 19:11 But he said unto them, All men cannot receive this saying, save they to whom it is given. 19:12 For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mothers womb: and there are some eunuchs, which have been made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heavens sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.
– Jesus
Matthew 25:40. When you have done it for the least among you, you have done it for me.
(Matthew 19:12)
Stephens 1550 Textus Receptus
eisin gar eunoucoi oitineV ek koiliaV mhtroV egennhqhsan outwV kai eisin eunoucoi oitineV eunoucisqhsan upo twn anqrwpwn kai eisin eunoucoi oitineV eunoucisan eautouV dia thn basileian twn ouranwn o dunamenoV cwrein cwreitwI find this topic interesting so here’s some basic research. Most Christians seem to ignore their grievous transgressions (see Exodus & Leviticus) but, boy, are they sticklers for their passages concerning the wickedness of homosexuals and queer folk!
(Catholic Saint) Clement of Alexandria warned Christians against the evils of eunuch servants being placed in charge of women, because they will act as pimps for the women, and moreover, “the true eunuch is not unable, but [merely?] unwilling to have sex.”
Important point because many will claim that the first type of eunuch is simply incapable of sexual relations.
Apuleius, student of Plato, tells of a band of “half-men” [semiviri], who call each other “girls” [puellae] and have sex with young men, both as active and as passive partners.
They also acted as cultic priests of the Mother Goddess, a traditional role for eunuchs.
Pliny the Elder assigned eunuchs and hermaphrodites to the “third gender called half-male.”
One having both male and female sexual characteristics.
That’s almost as cool and creative as Roman law:
Ulpian says (D 21.1.6.2): “To me it appears the better view that a eunuch is not diseased or defective, but healthy, just like a man who has one testicle, who is also able to procreate.”
Paulus (D 21.1.7) clarifies: “If, on the other hand, someone is a eunuch in such a way that he is missing a necessary part of his body, even internally, then he is diseased.”
In Physiognomy 2.3, Adamantios said that: “The characteristics of natural eunuchs are worse than those of other men. So most of them are savage, deceitful evildoers, each one more so than the last.
In the same vein, see the statement given by Lucian’s character Diocles in The Eunuch, that a eunuch is “worse off than a castrated priest of Cybele [bakêlos], for the latter had at least known manhood once, but the eunuch had been “cut off” from the very first and was an ambiguous sort of creature like a crow, which cannot be reckoned with either doves or ravens” (Eunuch 8). Likewise, Diocles’s explanation that “a eunuch is neither male nor female, but something composite, hybrid, and monstrous, alien to human nature” (Eunuch 6).
…The tests are never performed, but the reputed eunuch, who now wants to be thought of as a male in order to secure the academic position, sets to having sex with as many women as he can to prove he is not a eunuch. And the narrator of the story prays at the end that his own young son will have the genital skills required to be a philosopher (Eunuch 13).
December 19, 2014 at 2:26 am #43196Fool TurtleParticipantSainkho Namtchylak : Let the Sunshine
Sainkho Namtchylak : Let the Sunshine
December 19, 2014 at 4:27 pm #43198StevenModeratorWarning to the reader: If you are a Christian, you may not want to read this, as it will likely anger you.
I’m sure my comments would piss off a lot of people, but to me, why anyone would want to be a Christian or believe what the Bible says to begin with, boggles my mind. Wanting to feel accepted by Christian doctrine, to me is like a black man wanting acceptance by the KKK. It is a hateful philosophy to begin with, so why would you want to be part of it?
Yes, I say the religious philosophy is hateful, not just “oh, it’s the people that are hateful, but the religious philosophy is ok (or the teachings of Christ are OK)”. No. I actually feel that the philosophy itself–every part–start to finish–is not representative of existence at all, and is quite hateful.
The whole religion is based on sin and judgment.
People are born with “original sin”.
Already by being born, you’ve got a negative mark against you.
“The wages of sin is death”But apparently, the almighty creator impregnated a human virgin girl with himself, so that he could be born as a human. Then later, he sacrifices himself to himself, so that all that believe in him, will be free of the sin that was given to them via the creation he was responsible for, to begin with.
Yeah, right.
And I believe in Santa Claus too.Oh, and he will come again to judge the living and the dead.
So there is more judgment coming.
Yahoo!!!When this whole religion is about judging things to be sins, and it is casting judgment on folks, this is–for me–not in resonance at all with the nature of the Tao, creation, life, etc.
The path of the Tao is about “everything that arises is natural” and that nothing that is here is a mistake. The core spiritual essence of existence is unconditional love and acceptance. This is the opposite of judgment.
I’ve done a lot of deep meditations over many years, trying to really tap into the core nature of reality and the true source of it all, and the only feeling I’ve ever received is one of unconditional love and acceptance. This whole idea of judgment and making people feel bad about themselves is a man-made invention. It is a POISON that has infected our collective minds for countless generations, mostly due to Western religious texts.
Remember, the Bible was written by human beings. For me, I’d rather not listen to what other human beings say about the True Source, I think I’d like to hear from it myself. And, to be honest, everything I’ve heard so far is in complete contrast to what is written in the books of the Western religions. For me, I’d rather trust what the True Source says directly, rather than a second-hand story written about it in hateful books by humans.
S
December 31, 2014 at 12:00 am #43200nomadParticipantthis is a great post on smoking! just came across this… thanks Steven!
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.