Stephen Hawking on parallel universes & ISSUE OF CHOICE

*They struggle because they fail to see themselves in the other*
nice. . .
i’m gonna put that one on my wall at work (only using we instead of they)

What if you see your self in others yet you judge your self and have little compassion for your self?

“I have an impression that I am being lectured too. If you are unshure of my understanding on a subject please feel free to ask. I understand it is out of a place of love and caring but best to limmit assumptions. I understand I can not hit a topic from every angle on my own.”

I’m sorry if it felt that way to you but I’m not intentionally doing that. I am simply sharing my opinions with you. I think we lose something in the translation of the medium we are using to have a conversation.

I don’t have any expectations of you or anyone else hitting a topic “from every angle”. I’m a little lost about what you mean about making assumptions. If it is important we can discuss it, or we can just let it go. I have been enjoying the sharing. That’s all.

-A

When you/me/we see that we are in lack of love for ourselves we can either:

A- take a deep breath and smile to ourselves
B- Go get a beer and turn on the TV
C- Kick the dog (ha! sorry, no pun intended)
D- “other”

“then, to me, your seeing is only partial because judgement is identifying with a fragment to the exclusion of the whole. ”

I like your definitions. I think subconcously we already see your self in others and it is when you start to do the inner work

“accept yourself as you are, then virtue can develop and compassion for others can follow”

that It becomes more concouse(spelling?). As well as all the stuff mentioned above.

the best evidence I see of what’s going on with the universe and consiousness is phi

dan winter has devoted a lifetime to teaching material on phi and sacred geometry (excellent workbook by Robert Lawlor called Sacred Geometry is highly suggested)

Dan suggests that grivational fields are best modelled through scalar waveforms whose harmonic multiples are phi…

where implosion generates gravitational accretion while simultaneously interconnecting “zero points”

the point here being that both the pineal gland, dna, and heart demonstrate “phi” like architecture, as does much of nature..

the pineal gland in particular..

this has old alchemical roots in the nature of “quintessence” or fiveness and the “Sol”
as Star..

it is not hard to see a new age extension of the TAO process where the “GOD STAR” has taken precendence over the somewhat intimidating night of time..

a big question here is, in context of TAO, KHABS as star consiousness KHABBALAH, new age, universal process, etc,

is what were LEARY/WILSON/LILLY talking about when they speak of circuits 7 and 8?

Leary posited the 8th circuit of consciousness as subatomic, galactic in scope, quantum in measure, consiousness preceeding the biological tapeloop of DNA which itself could merit being called GOD

James Hurtak presents lots of material in the Keys of Enoch concerning the

“SOLAR OUTPUT BUFFER”

which he says steps down frequencies which pertain to the overself which is existing in multiple time zones simultaneously..

and prevents us from going insane from quantum overload..

he suggests that superspecies evolve whivh can avatar into different timezones via this overself..