September 25, 2007 at 11:25 pm #24556
to whom it may concern, this is reposted form another forum:
primordial consciousness fields
does the body have a field infrastructure keyed to the hydrogen atom—-
Dr. Leary created circuit 8 of the model as “neuroatomic consiousness”
quote from Leary: “galactic in scope, quantum in nature”
quote from Rob Wilson: “STAR TREK is a better guide to the emerging reality than anything in the NEW YORK REVIEW OF BOOKS. The life-support and defense-system engineer, Scotty (circuit I), the emotional-sentimental Dr. McCoy (circuit II), the logical science officer Mr. Spock (circuit III) and the alternately paternalistic and romantic Captain Kirk (circuit IV) are perpetually voyaging through our future neurological history and encountering circuit V, VI, VII, and VIII intelligences, however crudely presented.”
My point is that all three circuit modelers used Ketamine to access circuit 8? why? apparently the same reason that the Hune Dune is accessed via dark room cave retreats
the fields of the hun dun wu are accessed via a series of intra-body polar reversals coupled with darkness seclusion.. the hun dun is the primordial womb, the wu the supreme unknown… it is the primordial womb of unity, the great birthplace of the tao
nei dan gong is the internal science of the larger tao (the i ching being another extension)
once again, WIlson: “As Lao-tse said from his own Circuit VIII perspective, “The greatest is within the smallest.””
from Leary: ” To summarize this summary of the 8th Eschatological Circuit: organic life evolves to become part of a metaphysiological contelligence which is nuclear-gravitational in structure, and which creates unified force-fields, galactic in scope, quantum in nature.”
nei dan gong is the study of force fields.. mental “magnetics”
so what does any of that mean?
the primordial fields are aligned with via planetary resonance, stellar resonance and focus projection…
why pre-biological? leary’s theorem: genetic material is seeded from an interstellar source to unfold in a predictable manner
from Leary: ” The genetic code is surely not an accidental adhesion of molecules. It is an instrumental message, an energy directive created by a meta-biological intelligence. This intelligence is astrophysical and galactic in scope, pervasive, ubiquitous, but miniaturized in quanta structure. Just as the multi-billion year blue-print of biological evolution is packaged within the nucleus of every cell, so may the quantum-mechanical blueprint of astronomical evolution be found in the nucleus of the atom. ”
The fields of the primordial are said to have erupted with the birthing process of the tao through the cosmic thunderclap
so what does any of that mean? these are internal body practices that are designed to reverse and reciprocate the electrical currents of the body just like a whirling DNA spindle which revolves round the primal hydrogen atom.. the further out you expand, the deeper inside a unified field things appear to get… from segregation to internal unity..
“The eighth phase of evolution is transformation of contelligence to meta-physiological, neuro-atomic structures. This quantum-mechanical process does not necessarily involve the destruction of organic memories or biological contelligence – but probably an incorporation of the neurogenetic into the nuclear-gravitational-quantum.”
from WIlson: “.a quantum model of consciousness and/or a conscious model of quantum mechanics by the turned-on physicists discussed previously (Prof. John Archibald Wheeler, Saul-Paul Sirag, Dr. Fritjof Capra, Dr. Jack Sarfatti, etc.) indicates strongly that the “atomic consciousness” first suggested by Leary in “The Seven Tongues of God” (1962) is the explanatory link which will unite parapsychology and paraphysics into the first scientific empirical experimental theology in history.”September 26, 2007 at 6:21 am #24557
I get that you are saying Leary’s model is compatible with the Taoist one… (the connection between caves and ketamine is not so easy for me…) although I note he himself did not come up with the ‘series of pole-reversals’…
Here’s my question:
>>”atomic consciousness” first suggested by Leary in “The Seven Tongues of God” (1962) is the explanatory link which will unite parapsychology and paraphysics into the first scientific empirical experimental theology in history.” <<
… why is it the first? Or do you consider that what's taught here for example, is not empirical or not scientific? Or not experimental? Or not 'theology'? I think what's taught here is all of those.
I guess what I'm saying is there seems to be an underlying model in what you say which is that these old cave methods need to be brought up to speed with modern science, whereas I think the opposite is true.
jSeptember 26, 2007 at 9:33 am #24559
I know you love Leary and feel inspired by him, and want to put the alchemical practaices into modern language.
But I wonder what would happen if you spent the time reading and quoting his 8 circuit theory into practice of the Mdacrocosmic Orbit, with its 8 circuits – with the intention of going beyond his consciousness?
Note that in the recent UK Advanced Lesser Kan & Li (CDs to avoilable soon) I have included the Wudang MacroOrbit practice as well – which i think might offer you the ground you need to really test the functionality of those circuits.
mSeptember 26, 2007 at 6:43 pm #24561
not that there is anything wrong with old school,
but tibet/china/india obviously did not have atomic physics or modern healthcare..
or a space program..
you can argue all day about which is better, worse etc..
but one way or another, without “secret techniques” no one has lived up to the success of modern healthcare in fixing emergency situations..
long term maybe, maybe old school was better..
same thing for space and phsycis.. no one had hubble, no one ddid zero-g research..
if the old is that good then bring it on in to the new..
why not flash some flare and make something new and cool..September 26, 2007 at 6:51 pm #24563
by 8 circuits of the macro cosmic do you just mean the 8 channels?
what about a spiffy space age version of it..
it’s so beneficial to everyone in my opinion to come at it from a different point of view..
what, i want to leave the word I out of it here, I am talking about is in the nature of collective good and science…
one model is biochemical and interplanetary, simultaneously jungian freudian etc
the other is old sacred etc
see leary’s octave analogy to the elements
it’s useful to me to have a new understanding of the truth..
if it’s monopole it’s a monopole..
how would you associate nei dan gong with the new gravity probe B space-time flexibility results?
how can you incorporate liquid crystallinity, gravity efefcts and acupunture channels into extra planetary biology
that’s the point in re-framing it.. it was more than leary, or wilson, or raw..
it’s a way to be space capabale and biochemical, atomic and gravitational in the previously only mysticSeptember 27, 2007 at 6:41 am #24565
… but wasn’t suggesting that ‘the old way as a whole’ was better than the ‘new way as a whole’ exactly. I would certainly say our acute emergency medicine is high-par but equally we have more acute emergencies owing to not being so aware of longer-range cycles in the world and in ourselves.
I guess what I was really asking was, why is the Leary model so privileged in terms of its vocabulary etc. as to be the one that you think everything else should be translated into? I’m not certain what it is about that model which makes it in your opinion more amenable to science. For example it seems (or Michael thinks anyway) that Stalker is talking about something that could interface modern science with ‘old school’ as you call it.
I’m as avid as anyone to see these disciplines studied in our time BTW, and I suppose physical science is a part of that process. But what makes the Leary model so special that it suddenly allows a scientific theology where one wasn’t available before?September 27, 2007 at 9:55 pm #24567
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.