Home › Forum Online Discussion › General › Was Hiroshima A-bomb damage Propaganda? Bart Jordan & Bruce Cathie on Nuclear Triggers
- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years, 4 months ago by RichieRich.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 7, 2016 at 12:21 pm #47000Michael WinnKeymaster
Note: I feel that the planet is in transition, and an important part of that change is revealing the extent to which governments lie in order to manipulate the masses. I know how much cover-up there was on 9/11, have read convincing documents that Pearl Harbor was “allowed to happen” to get us into WWII, and now we have these exposees questioning whether most of the Hiroshima damage was from firebombing, not nuclear blast. Why are there such low radiation counts in Hiroshima and on the Bikini Atoll where supposedly 23 tests were conducted above ground? People have been living there since 1968.
The other reason I’m suspicious about nuclear arsenals is because of extensive conversations I had with Bart Jordan, who claims he was a child prodigy involved in the Manhattan Project that built the first bomb. His code name was “the Brat”. He was a 9 year old channel for highly esoteric scientific information, and he says it is extremely difficult to split the atoms to trigger a rapid explosive chain reaction. That was his job, to solve that problem. His teacher was friends with Edward Teller,and Teller got interested because Bart was telling his teacher information about the distance between Mars and its moons that was precise and accurate. A wild story.
Another scientist, Bruce Cathie, has come out with similar information. His research shows that that explosive nuclear reactions (whether fusion or fission) are alchemical processes, not mechanical processes – that must be in alignment with larger cosmic forces, i.e. positions of the sun and moon:
” …nuclear weapons can only be successfully detonated when the major
celestial bodies including the sun and the moon are in a favorable
configuration relative to the nuclear device itself, as positioned over
the surface of the earth.Setting aside such classified information as the design of nuclear
triggers and of the compressional properties of plutonium under
implosion, the true secret of the bomb is thus revealed.Information presented to demonstrate the key energetic musical ratios
(the music of the spheres) as are necessary to actually allow for one
to engineer a nuclear explosion arguably the highest classification
level of nuclear secrets.”Listening to the “music of the spheres”is a central practice of higher inner alchemy formulas that I teach (not part of Mantak Chia transmission, which was more basic level).
To read more on Bruce Cathie:
http://www.holographic-disclosure.com/nuclear-war-fear-mongering/#This is really an eye opener, if true. But it accords with what Bart Jordan told me – he was channelling ancient Greek musical ratios as the basis of his scientific knowledge. The Greek civilization that existed before the current “ancient” greeks we study in Homer, etc.
ARTICLE
——————
On This Atom Bomb Anniversary Youre Being Lied to About Hiroshima and Much More to Make You Fearful
By Daily Bell Staff – August 06, 2016Japan marked the 71st anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima on Saturday by renewing calls for a nuclear weapons free world and urging leaders to follow the example of President Barack Obama and visit the bomb sites. Washington Post
It is the anniversary of dropping an atom bomb on Hiroshima. But the Hiroshima narrative is a lie.
Weve reported at considerable length about how the whatever was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki didnt have the kind of immediate destructive impact that is portrayed.
Crawford Sams who ran the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission in Japan had this to say about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (Transcript HERE.) :
When the bomb went off, about 2 thousand people out of 250 thousand got killed [in Hiroshima] by blast, by thermal radiation, or by intense x-ray, gamma radiation You see, it wasnt Bing like the publicity here [said]: a bomb went off and a city disappeared. No such thing happened. That was the propaganda for deterrent
When I came back to this country, I was appalled, from a military standpoint, to find that our major planners in the War Department were using their own propaganda, 100 thousand deaths, Bing!
You dont hear much about the effects of Nagasaki because actually it was pretty ineffective. That was a narrow corridor from the hospital down to the port, and the effects were very limited as far as the fire spread and all that stuff. So you dont hear much about Nagasaki.
Weve reported that a squadron of 66 bombers were launched on August 6th (666) to bomb the municipality of Imabari, even though Imabari. had been bombed already, twice.
This bombing squadron may well have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead, as Hiroshima was not far away. HERE is a video on the squadron and also a narrative from a book by Edwin Hoyt entitled Inferno, the Firebombing of Japan.
Here is some narrative from a PERTINENT PAGE in the actual book.
Suddenly, one day, I was told something unexpected, Manabe said. When I was looking at the train timetable, I found that no trains stopped at Imabari station I wondered why the third largest city in the province had no train service. It sounded ridiculous.
The other guy said, Wow! No Imabari Station. But all the trains pass by Imabari Station.
A third guy stepped up Its not strange at all. Theres no stop because theres no Imabari City anymore. It got burned up last April in the air raid No buildings, no houses, no people The whole city burned up and the people ran away
A fellow soldier explained to Manabe. The air raids came on the 26th of April and the 8th of May. Imabari was burned up. My father was in business there. We had a wholesale draper business. All gone. All burned up.
The attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were horrible and tragic. But whether they were results of atom bombs (certainly in the sense that people understand them today) is at least seriously questionable.
More from the Post:
Quoting part of Obamas speech in Hiroshima in May, Mayor Kazumi Matsui urged countries with nuclear weapons to have the courage to escape the logic of fear, and pursue a world without them
I once again urge the leaders of all nations to visit the A-bombed cities. Like Obamas, he said that such visits will surely etch the reality of the atomic bombings in each heart.
Visiting Hiroshima and Nagasaki wont etch anything into your heart but lies.
And the sickening falsehoods allow politicians a faux rhetorical nobility that they dont deserve.
Whatever happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki is nothing like what is being recited today.
Bikini Atoll, where additional atomic bombs were tested following the Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks, was repopulated by 1968, even though radiation estimates suggested the island would be uninhabitable for a thousand years.
The actual bomb blasts seem to have been faked. Two years ago, the controversial but prolific investigator Miles Mathis an artist and mathematician published a debunking HERE entitled, The Bikini Atoll Nuclear Tests were Faked.
For more proof, we can go to Google. You can get a picture of the Bikini Atoll today from Google Earth. Thats dated 2013, not 1945. We are told the locals cant live there now because of radioactivity, but we see at least three proofs against that.
We see lots of plant life both on and offshore. Radioactivity affects plants just as it .affects animals, so the island should be barren.
Remember, the Bikini Atoll wasnt said to be blasted by only Able and Baker. It was blasted 23 times, including three of the biggest blasts ever from US testing: the 4.5 megaton Navajo and the 5 megaton Tewa, in 1956; and the 15 megaton Bravo in 1954.
Why would Bikini Island tests have been faked if the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were real?
Did the US suddenly run out of bombs?
And what about Russia? How did the USSR make nuclear bombs while the Pentagon was faking theirs?
Mathis writes some photographs of USSR nuclear explosions appear fake.
When did the USSR get the bomb? And even more importantly, when did the US finally create the weapons of mass destruction that so frighten us today?
When did the Cold War really start? Did both sides know that nuclear weapons were not as powerful as advertised? Or maybe that they didnt exist at all as described?
Hiroshima and Nagasaki themselves are thriving small cities and there is no appreciable difference in radiation between these two municipalities and other cities in Japan.
Additional issues (See sources at the end of this article.):
Death rates at Hiroshima and Nagasaki are not higher than elsewhere.
Three days after the Hiroshima bombing, a trolley was running again.
The bank at ground zero remains standing to this day.
Eight Jesuits hiding in their church survived the blast at ground zero to tell the tale spared only by the intervention of the Virgin Mary.
Outside of the Jesuits, and one communist reporter who hated the US, there was no significant reporting from either Hiroshima or Nagasaki for at least a month.
For years in both Japan and the US, it was a crime punishable by death to speak or write about the bombings.
The entire atom bomb narrative created by the Pentagon was delivered to the public via a single writer from the New York Times who later turned out to be on the Pentagon payroll.The narrative of the bombings was surely shaped just as the Pentagon and its controllers wished for it to be. It was acquiesced to by the Japanese government that had its own reasons for promoting nuclear untruths.
Whatever happened at Hiroshima and Nagasaki has not been accurately reported. In fact, it is probably not too strong to say that what has been reported may constitute (in aggregate) one of the most profound lies of the 20th century.
It calls into question further truths about Western society that we live with to this day.
Nuclear weapons are a perfect propaganda for the state.
-Their tests cannot be ascertained at close range because they are too powerful.
-Their inner workings cannot be disseminated because they are top secret.
-Their programmatic elements cannot be observed by the normal media because too much information available to the public can stimulate adversarial or even terrorist activity.
Modern Western society is a virtual tissue of lies designed to make you believe you are living in a civil society (no, its not civil) faced by life-threatening challenges that only Western governments and the shadowy powers behind them can overcome.
The world is not running out of food, nor water. Its not going to burn to a cinder because the air is clogged with carbon.
The economic disasters we face are purely man-made. Absent monopoly central banking, they would not exist.
Now we are facing radical Islam another false narrative put in place by the same banking elite that has tortured the West for centuries.
This follows on the heels of numerous, serial US wars and the obscene, manufactured Hell of World Wars One and Two.
Thank goodness for the Internet and what we have called the Internet Reformation.
Thanks to information that has emerged from secret recesses (and the patterns they portray), we know more about the Way the World Really Works than any single group of individuals in recorded history.
Conclusion: It has been a great privilege to live in these unusual times. However, please take note: The reality of the world has revealed a titanic struggle between good and evil. Which side are you on? And just as importantly, what are you going to do about it?
Some Nuclear Anomalies and Sources Pertaining to Questionable Hiroshima and Nagasaki Events
The dreaded mushroom cloud presented by the Hiroshima memorial is actually a photo of Hiroshima on fire. HERE.
A squadron of 66 bombers was directed to Imabari. in the early morning of August 6 (666) the morning of the A-bomb but Imabari. had been bombed already, twice. This bombing squadron might have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead. HERE.
Initial reports in Japan were that Hiroshima was firebombed. AP filed the same report. HERE.
In the aftermath of the explosion, Hiroshima (and Nagasaki) look no different than Tokyo after it was firebombed. HERE and HERE.
In Hiroshima numerous buildings are standing along with erect tree stumps. HERE.
Limited trolley service was revived in Hiroshima after only three days. HERE.
The Hiroshima bank at the epicenter of the bomb is fully functional and can be seen HERE.
Predictions of endless radiation poisoning for thousands of years proved untrue. Today, Hiroshima and Nagasakis radiation levels are normal. HERE.
Outdoor shadows and other dramatic evidences of the Hiroshima bombing seem to be faked. HERE.
The initial American reporting on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs came from Wilfred Burchett and William L. Laurence. One was a communist (Burchett) who hated America and reportedly ended up on the Kremlins payroll. HERE.
The other was secretly a paid employee of US armed forces. He was the man who rode with the crew to witness the nuke dropped on Nagasaki. His report on the attack is painful to read for all the wrong reasons. HERE.
Laurence was also the only reported to cover the development of the atomic bomc, see the initial bomb testing (from 20 miles away) and to report from Nagasaki. In other words, only one reporter, paid by the US war dept, provided the entirety of the initial civilian narrative for the testing of nuclear devices and then bombing of Nagasaki. Just one. It was roughly the same at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Reporters were not allowed to visit. HERE.
Military officers were asked to exaggerate the injury count.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were apparently shut down for months. There was no influx of Western reporters. The nuclear narrative was developed by the Pentagon from what we can tell. HERE.
It was immediately made a crime punishable by death in both the US and Japan to discuss nuclear attacks and the technology that created them. (The restricted dataclauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens.) HERE.
As for Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, photos show it seems to lack the necessary antennas to function. HERE.
There were apparently several Little Boys of various sizes, not just one. HERE.
The narrative surrounding the dropping of the Hiroshima bombing is reportedly inaccurate. Levers were pulled to drop the bomb, but the automatic system did the job. HERE.
The automatic targeting system itself was an inaccurate device that reportedly might drop bombs miles from where the pilot hoped to deliver them. The odds that both bombs ended up delivering effective blasts are surprisingly low.
The Nagasaki bombing narrative was confused for decades. The story kept changing. Even the pilot was misidentified. The crews were switched. HERE.
The photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud are suspicious. They appear to be composite images with cloud cover inserted to ensure that identification of Nagasaki is impossible. HERE. Other Nagasaki photos appear fake.
One of the two famous and supposedly identical photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud includes part of a plane. One of the photos is thus fake, or at least retouched. HERE.
For events of such magnitude, there are surprisingly few eyewitness accounts of the actual blast. Many eyewitness accounts start the day after the blast or during the firestorm. Only a few Japanese survivors have stepped forward to become regular faces of the blast.
There dont seem to be any civilian photos of either mushroom cloud taken by Japanese civilians or even military facilities. This one HERE looks evidently faked.
Much of the Western Hiroshima narrative regarding the blast was developed by a single Jesuit priest who, along with other Jesuits, had survive at the epicenter of the blast through the intervention of the Virgin Mary. HERE.
The eyewitness accounts of the blast itself have a repetitive and artificial quality to them, at least the ones we read. One doctor claims to have treated 2000-3000 injured on the first day. HERE.There are other disturbing elements to the Nagasaki and Hiroshima bombings, and if you are interested, you can see more documents calling many elements of the attacks into question HERE.
See information on an alternative theory regarding nuclear weapons HERE:
Additional DB Nuclear Articles to Share (With Links)
North Korea Nuclear Hoax Heightens Alternative Media Skepticism March 10
The Trillion Dollar Nuclear Weapons Fraud April 15
NASA and Nuclear Activities: More Scrutiny Needed May 25
NY Times Uses Hiroshima to Justify Gun Control, Even as More Evidence Questions A-Bomb Scenario June 15
NY Times: Hiroshima Mushroom Cloud Actually Smoke from Raging Firestorm June 20
Brexits Modern Manipulation and Its A-Bomb Beginnings June 29
Pentagons Not Properly Funding Its Trillion-Dollar Nuclear Costs July 1
More Nuke Questions: Lies About Trident, Hiroshima, Nagasaki and Now Bikini, Too July 25
North Korea Nuclear Tensions Said to Increase But How Do We Know Its True? July 28
North Korea Has Missiles, but Does It Have Nuclear Weapons? August 3
How Dangerous, Really? Trump Now Denies Asking Why US Does Not Use Nuclear Weapons August 3
August 7, 2016 at 2:32 pm #47001Michael WinnKeymasterShock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesnt Believe in Nukes
By Daily Bell Staff – August 07, 2016Shock Interview: Anders Björkman Is a Professional Technologist Who Doesn’t Believe in Nukes
Anders Björkman, M.Sc. is a Naval Architect and Marine Engineer with more than 45 years experience of tanker and ferry design, construction and operations. Mr. Bjorkman has been a delegate to the IMO for various national administrations and one NGO and has been been a speaker at various Safety-at-Sea conferences. Mr. Bjorkman holds several patents concerned with ship safety. He also writes about A-bombs, human clowns in space, mysterious structural collapses, etc. He believes nuclear weapons dont exist. See his website HERE: http://heiwaco.com/bomb.htm. His CV can be seen HERE.
The Daily Bell: Hello there. Youre a controversial commentator, of course, and your website is a shock for those just stumbling on it. But whether its accurate or not, its also interesting and even courageous. So thanks for sitting down with us. We try to operate without bias, and thus wont endorse your conclusion that nuclear weapons dont exist. But we certainly have difficulties with the current narrative. We cover the dominant social themes of the elite their propaganda and nuclear disinformation is certainly part of it. [Ed. Note: See updated DB nuclear summary HERE.] You seem very confident of your conclusions.
Anders Björkman: I am quite good at hydrodynamics and wave forces on ships and how to design the ship structures to suit. It is more complicated than nuclear physics! Once you make certain logical deductions, you realize that nuclear explosions are impossible.
The Daily Bell: OK, then, when did you decide that nuclear weapons were a hoax? You wrote to us that it took 50 years?
Anders Björkman: Actually, it took me 40 years to become an A-bomb denier. I worked in Japan 1972/6 and learnt a lot about the A-bombs there and many other things that didnt add up. And in 1999 I met E and her father W who had assisted Stalin build his a-bomb 1949. W was employed in Wismut AG in Saxony digging uranium for Stalins bomb since 1945. But the mine was propaganda and didnt produce anything worthwhile. This person was later arrested by KGB and had a hard time fleeing West. It seems Stalin and FDR agreed to fake the A-bomb together from 1942 onwards in my opinion today. FDR adored Stalin and handed him eastern Europe on a platter.
The Daily Bell: Why did you decide to write a website? How long did it take and when did it go up?
Anders Björkman: In 1994 a ferry sank in the Baltic killing 1,000 persons. I was operating similar ferries and wanted to know what happened. I soon found out that the authorities invented a fairy tale the visor had fallen off but apparently the ship was sunk due to sabotage. I wrote a book about it 1998 and the authorities didnt like it. Later it became a website. At that time I met E at Mombasa Kenya and she supported my safety-at-sea work. E and her father W were refugees from East Germany and had had problems with KGB and Stasi regarding Wismut AG uranium in the 1950s. So I decided to make a website about the A-bomb, too.
The Daily Bell: Do other scientists surreptitiously agree with you?
Anders Björkman: When it comes to safety at sea I have many supporters. A-bomb? I get plenty positive response via e-mail.
The Daily Bell: Youve been banned from various chat rooms and forums, yes?
Anders Björkman: It seems so. People link to me. I join the chat rooms and explain my websites and my findings. Many people do not like it.
The Daily Bell: Do most people working in the area of nuclear weapons believe they work? Physicists, too?
Anders Björkman: The reason I became a naval architect/marine engineer/ship builder was a hint I got from a Nobel Prize winner physics, MS, that I knew 1964. MS was a friend of my grandfather. I wanted to study physics but MS didnt really encourage me. Plenty of strange people were doing physics is Sweden then planning A-bombs, human space rockets, etc. So I studied mechanical sciences instead. More fun. Later, when I had met E, I found out that MS had been asked to design a Swedish A-bomb 1945 and agreed! Subject to everything being peer reviewed and published in the public domain. MS didnt get the job and was asked to shut up. Rockefeller provided one million so he could work with the cyclotron.
The Daily Bell: All right, grant your argument for interview purposes. Where does the lying begin? How far up?
Anders Björkman: It started 1945 with Hiroshima. No A-bomb exploded there. Roosevelt and Stalin worked together on the story.
The Daily Bell: Really? Quite a reversal of history if true. Do political leaders know nowadays in your view? Or are they in the dark as well? Did Truman know for instance?
Anders Björkman: Political leaders are generally incompetent and just repeat like parrots what is politically correct at the time.
The Daily Bell: You think nuclear power is valid. How does nuclear power work?
Anders Björkman: Fission works. But it must be moderated and it works only in peaceful, nuclear power stations. Fission was discovered 1938 but most physicists didnt really understand how it worked until the 1950s. Atom bombs dont work because you cant ignite the uranium to cause an uncontrolled explosion. Compressing uranium metal to double density with a neutron in between to ignite an A-bomb is just a fantasy. Here, from my website:
So in the end the experts agreed that sudden implosion (a process in which objects are destroyed by collapsing or being squeezed in on themselves) of uranium metal atoms to twice normal density would initiate the A-bomb detonation that would last a few nano-seconds without any testing.
Of course with a fast, free neutron in between starting it! That little thing a fast, free neutron will start exponentially fissioning billions of compressed or imploded metal atoms releasing energy and more fast, free neutrons. An A-bomb explodes! But you cannot compress an atom or a solid piece of metal by implosion. It just bounces. And the fast neutrons in between just fly away.
The Daily Bell: You point out that even when the A-Bomb was almost ready for use, those building it didnt know how to trigger it.
Anders Björkman: I provided a record of correspondence:
March 27, 1943 a Mr. Tolman wrote to Oppenheimer about using explosives to collapse a shell into a critical mass (to ignite the a-bomb).
September 1944 a Mr. Robert Christy suggested the Christy gadget, the use of a solid core that is raised to supercriticality solely by compressing the metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb)!
April 11, 1945 Oppenheimer reported that Kistiakowsky had achieved optimal performance with implosion compression in sub-scale tests (to ignite the a-bomb).
April 27, 1945 Tokyo Bay (only water of course!) was dropped as a target (!) (to demonstrate ignition of the bomb) because it had already been burned down (poor fish!). Imagine burning down a sea.
June 21, 1945 The first implosion initiator (LOL) was ready. Imagine that. An implosion initiator! To compress metal to twice normal density (to ignite the a-bomb).The Daily Bell: The implication is that they never did figure it out. OK, didnt you make reference to HG Wells?
Anders Björkman: Yes, here:
The A-bombs were actually invented by science fiction writer H.G Wells already 1913 nearly 30 years before US president Roosevelt started the top-secret Manhattan Project. Wells The World Set Free describes cities around the world being devastated by what he called atomic bombs. Wells predicted not only the mushroom cloud we associate with a-bombs, but their lasting radiation as well.
Few who adventured into these areas of destruction and survived attempted any repetition of their experiences. There are stories of puffs of luminous, radio-active vapour drifting sometimes scores of miles from the bomb centre and killing and scorching all they overtook.
The Daily Bell: All right, thanks. Thats the literary reference, but how about the project itself?
Anders Björkman: The A-bomb was invented by the Manhattan project team 1942/5. It was just fantasy and propaganda to end WWII and scare the USSR. All was top secret. The people involved had all signed a secrecy agreement and couldnt blow the whistle.They faked it from the start.
Ultimately, Oppenheimer was in charge. Then there was Niels Bohr, Nobel prize winner physics and a good friend of my grandfather. Bohr discovered/developed fission 1939 but could not really explain it. Bohr was working in Nazi-occupied Denmark 1942 but escaped to Sweden and stayed with my grandfather before being shipped off to USA to assist Oppenheimer inventing the A-bomb. When Bohr returned he could still not explain fission and how to ignite an a-bomb. He was unhappy about the whole thing. Being regarded as a mass murder. Poor Niels.
The Daily Bell: Why would governments fool their people into believing there were such things as atom bombs when they dont exist?
Anders Björkman: To scare them! It is a nice way steal money from the tax payers.
The Daily Bell: How many reporters reported on the nuclear narrative initially? We think just one and he was on the payroll of the Pentagon.
Anders Björkman: Media is controlled to promote the nuclear weapons threat. Latest is nuclear terrorism invented by Obama 2010. The people must be afraid of terrorists and nuclear weapons. The nuclear hoax is run by the Pentagon and the Russians and France, China, UK, etc.
The Daily Bell: Is it possible that Japanese witnesses to the bombings are not telling the truth or mis-remember?
Anders Björkman: Japan was occupied by USA 1945-53 and it was against the law to question the matter. When I lived in Japan from 72-6, the US military was still around. Plenty people just experienced the normal US napalm carpet/fire-bombings of the kind that had destroyed Tokyo but were told to shut up.
The Daily Bell: Tell us about the missing squadron of 66 bombers. What did they do?
Anders Björkman: US Army Air Force was bombing Japan every day in the summer of 1945. On August 6th, the young pilots were sent on a mission to bomb a city that had been bombed twice but their coordinates were probably switched. Anyway, they had no idea what they bombed. They just followed orders. Catch 22! That was for Hiroshima. Central Nagasaki was not hit at all.
The Daily Bell: Tell us why the Japanese government would go along with a nuclear bomb hoax.
Anders Björkman: The Japanese are very happy with their pacifist constitution and USA defending them. If the USA is proud of its ever-more powerful and fanciful bombs, the Japanese government will just nod agreement.
The Daily Bell: Lets talk about Bikini Atoll. Did nuclear bombs blow up on Bikini?
Anders Björkman: No! All photo shop. The A-bomb propaganda show soon became the H-bomb propaganda show and then came the ICBMs and mutual destruction, etc, etc. All fake, IMO. All tests are done in remote areas away from any civilian observers. Then you can invent anything. De Gaulle was clever blew up bombs in Sahara, and in some remote atoll in the Pacific. Brilliant. Didnt cost France much! The pictures are ridiculous black smoke, etc. But if a general says it is a nuclear explosion, nobody argues.
Top reporters are just following orders from above and their gate keepers. Same happened with the ferry that sank in 1994. All top reporters copied/pasted what the authorities told them. My findings were immediately considered conspiracy theories. I just suggested that the ferry sank due to hull leakage below waterline.
The Daily Bell: Why havent people stepped forward to denounce the secrecy and lying if it exists as you believe?
Anders Björkman: I had some local people assisting me with the ferry sinking. Two died, the rest just disappeared. Some are afraid. Most people are ignorant. I was far away from the action and felt safe. I actually wanted to help. Not appreciated.
The Daily Bell: Obviously, it had an impact on you. Usually when technology advances, it gets cheaper and smaller. Has this been the case with nuclear weapons?
Anders Björkman: Nuclear weapons do not work at all. All nuclear weapons are dummies.
The Daily Bell: Lets return to nuclear power for a moment. Are nuclear power plants dangerous?
Anders Björkman: I like peaceful nuclear power. Only problem seems to be to ensure cooling when shutting down. If you do not moderate safely, the plant may overheat and catch fire. But the public is badly informed. France is #1 in nuclear power and electricity is cheap. Germany has stopped it completely and must buy energy from Russia.
The Daily Bell: What about radiation? Is radiation as deadly as it is made out to be? How come plants and animals and people have repopulated Bikini when it was supposed to be sterile for 1000 years?
Anders Björkman: It is strange. When I did my military service we were all warned for the radiation and trained to protect us against it (and chemicals and biological weapons). But there is confusion between milli-Sieverts and micro-Sieverts. Milli- Sieverts are dangerous, we are told. But maybe only mikro-Sieverts were measured at Fukushima. Who cares? The local Yakusa hired some out of beggars, dressed them up in white boiler suits and soon all radiation had been cleared away.
The Daily Bell: Lets sum up. If you are correct, will the nuclear bomb hoax ever be formally acknowledged?
Anders Björkman: I hope so! Thats the purpose of my website. Maybe one day the US government will announce that their nuclear weapons program is a hoax. Donald and Hillary do not appear very competent.
The Daily Bell: Will they invent some other weapon?
Anders Björkman: Why would they? They are busy promoting Islamic terrorism!
The Daily Bell: Any other thoughts, comments? What are you going to do in the near future? Are your views having a negative impact on your business?
Anders Björkman: Not really. In my biz you never retire. There are some interesting projects going on. Luckily I have friends in shipping.
The Daily Bell: Is your website ever attacked?
Anders Björkman: No. I have two ISPs. Both work OK. I am the web master.
The Daily Bell: Do you think you will write a book at some point?
Anders Björkman: No. Hard copy books are history. A good web site is much, much better.
The Daily Bell: Good luck, then. Regardless of whether youre right or wrong, youre certainly making people think. We appreciate that.
August 10, 2016 at 4:09 am #47003russellnParticipantthat website “heiwaco” or his claimed company “heiwa co” strangely sounds like “hey wacko”. Sure is weird. Good to have independence of thought but wow, this is way off the scale and laced with humor. Did not read much of it but seems like a hobby, a source of amusement, or “just plum crazy”. Entertaining though.
August 10, 2016 at 5:34 am #47005RichieRichParticipantThe two Daily Bell articles and Björkman claim that atomic bombs weren’t very effective, certainly not nearly as effective as mainstream history suggests.
At the same time, we are told that Bart Jordan was channelling esoteric info from very ancient Greece in an attempt to make the bombs effective.
The implication would thus appear to be that, even though Jordan channelled all this remarkable info, it still wasn’t sufficient to make the bombs effective?
Have I got this right or have I missed something?
August 12, 2016 at 3:47 am #47007RichieRichParticipantBart Jordan’s an interesting guy. Here’s an extended interview with him on YouTube. And here’s one of Jordan’s articles, Ice Age Art and Science. Michael references this and another Jordan piece in his Magic Numbers, Planetary Tones and the Body: The Evolution of Daoist Inner Alchemy into Modern Sacred Science.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.