Home › Forum Online Discussion › Philosophy › Question for Michael and others, too on THOUGHTS………….
- This topic has 60 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 18 years, 3 months ago by TrueSelf.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 5, 2006 at 9:55 pm #16128DogParticipant
It will take me maybe a couple of days to respond, cense I have to read the artical. But I am not ignoring it.
August 7, 2006 at 8:26 am #16130Michael WinnKeymasterI think it’s best not to think of this as “sides”, but as ongoing explorationof truth.
I read thru the article on chia site, a high level appropriation of taoist neidan by Chan Buddhists who needed to put it into their language and their worldview. I think its great that Chan buddhists want to practice neidan. In their languaging they have to put everything into the language of “mind”, as that is the Buddhist focus.
The problem is not the neidan method or the focus on stillness, which is basic Tao practice going back to Nei Yeh in 460. B.C., but the underlying worldview presented in the article. The basic supposition is that everything human in Later Heaven is separated from Tao, rather than part of Tao.
Here is the beginning premise summary:
“1. When we were in our mother’s womb, we were filled with the primordial energy of the Tao. In the natal state, original nature and the energy of life are united.
2. At birth we come into contact with the world. When air is inhaled through the nostrils, the primordial breath within is contaminated and the connection with the Tao is broken.”The problem I have with this underlying premise is that I think its a false premise. Later Heaven is not an aberration and disconect from Tao, it is all part of Tao., an essential part of Tao process. Its not an accident or counter-tao that humans are born and they are separated from the primordial state – it is the clear manifestation of Tao process.
The premise inthis article appears aimed at someone who chooses not to live inthis world, i.e. for a Chan Buddhist monk trying to escape this world into a more perfect world of the primordial, a typical goal in hindu and Buddhist derived traditions. I believe this is essentially dualistic and escapist, even though the focus appears to be on achieving non dualism.
My exploration of this issue has led me to exactly the opposite conclusion: the the funamental purpose of humans is to grow the primordial within the post natal realm, which practically speaking means converting the primordial more skillfully into true yin and yang flow while stabilizing the immortal/sage consciousness within. When you’ve compelted your destiny then it may make sense to focus completely on withdtawal into hermit/monk lifestyle – that is a different intention for a different stage of one’s life.
There is no escaping the “corruption” of post-natal life, it doesn’t go away just because an adept heads off into the mountains and meditates. Unless you find a way to share that purificationand self-realization that occurs with this plane, your destiny (ming) will be incomplete even though your xing (essence) is more refined.
What that usually means is that your soul impels you into a cycle of retreat into pure mountains/meditation, followed by a cycle of living in the corrupt world that tests and truly refines your internal accomplishments in the cauldron of post natal fire and water that is merrily bubbling away on the surface, lawfully fed by the primordial sea of qi.
Smiles,
MichaelAugust 7, 2006 at 11:19 am #16132FajinParticipantHi Michael,
>>I think it’s best not to think of this as “sides”, but as ongoing explorationof truth.<>Unless you find a way to share that purificationand self-realization that occurs with this plane, your destiny (ming) will be incomplete even though your xing (essence) is more refined.<<
*Through Zen, I found that we have 2 selves. One is our postnatal heart shen integrated with the other 4 shen and the other is yuan shen. Yuan shen is like our deep subconcious. It is overshadowed by our personality (xin/yi-heart shen+4shen)and isn't functional. Zen training aims at reversing this and bringing our deep sub-concsious into play, our original nature. This is our final destiny (ming), to become who we really are. The return to primordial/Wu Ji/non-dual.
In Daoist nei dan, that's all you're doing in the shen to wu conversion, is using that refined shen and feeding it to yuan shen to become active and wu-hsin/wu-wei is brought about when our sub-concious enters the picture. Going to caves where there is nothing to feed our five senses is a bit more of a radical approach, but it is an easier process for the Buddhist. Remember, Lao Tzu said:
Sometimes the word for the tao is
One
Turning into ManySometimes the word for the tao is
Many
Turning into OneSeems like both Buddhist and Daoist disciplines are natural and don't go against the Dao.
Smiles,
FajinAugust 7, 2006 at 1:25 pm #16134baguaParticipantHi Fajin:
Sounds like you are enjoying your time in the mountains, I hope you will continue to share your realizations when you have time. Maybe I will come visit you next year if you are there.
I think what Michael (I dont want to speak for Michael, just my view) is implying is each of the five shen must find its own destiny, now that is one way to state it and can be misunderstood. I think Chan can do that. Anyways, maybe the folowing example of the five shen approach can clarify.
The Yi needs to know its in a body, that it must use its attributes of conceptualization and mental body to take care of the physical body, to participate in keeping in strong and healthy, any system that does not do that is an imcomplete system. So in the Tao practice we do the Yi, our intellect includes this approach to life. The deeper implication is if the Yi denies this then it is polarized or creates a tension, whether conscious or not. And the capicity of to live from our Yuan condition is blocked, the polarization of Yi prevents it.
bagua
August 7, 2006 at 2:18 pm #16136FajinParticipantHi Bagua,
I will drop by from time to time to the forum and would love to meet you in person one day, wether in China or the States.
Michael is making a nice implication with 5 shen’s destiny, but my point is that yuan shen is Wu Ji, the root, and the five shen’s destiny is to go back to the root as with all of the 10, 000 things and that’s what Zen does. It is wonderful how it goes straight to the root, isn’t it?
Yi and xin are horse mind and monkey mind, but beyond it is non-mind (wu-hisn). I like how you said there is a capacity to live from our yuan condition (yi). But beyond that, is our neutral condition which is where Dao eventually takes us.
Another realization I had was with a 6th element. In the Tibetan tradition and Indian Yogic tradition, there exists the element of space/ether. Look at your palm, 4 fingers and 1 thumb (earth) but what holds them together? The palm (space/ether). The foot with 5 toes. The torso with 1 head (earth) and 4 limbs.
This is the Wu Ji in life. The void, the zero point (science), that is permanent. The very root of everything. It’s the same thing with the Pa Kua. The 8 energy centres and the 9th within all of them that integrates them together, the microcosmic orbit. This is what makes things one. The line in the Tai Ji, the space element, the 9th empty force.
Smiles,
FajinAugust 7, 2006 at 2:22 pm #16138FajinParticipantAugust 7, 2006 at 2:43 pm #16140baguaParticipantHi Fajin:
I like what you are saying.
The alchemists will pick it apart, because they break each component done and in doing that they play with the separation and individual aspects of the pieces and then correct/shape/harmonize, restore them to the “original” conditon and after doing all of five then their integration. SO they will isolate and distinguish in their discussions, in a sense they polarize.
So the key is what are effective ways to allow our entire being to live from this Yuan awareness.
In my experience the Chan experience is inside the alchemy, I think you follow me? Chan practice is alchemy too and it does reveal the things you mention. I like both methods, for me there is no difference in experience, only the training wheels.
Enjoy the mountains,
bagua
August 7, 2006 at 2:53 pm #16142NnonnthParticipantHi Fajin and other contributors to this debate –
I just wanted to make clear something that Michael is saying which speaks to me, and which others do not seem to be addressing…
Fajin says that the personality overshadows original yuan nature and that therefore –
>>Zen training aims at reversing this and bringing our deep sub-concsious into play, our original nature<>the the fundamental purpose of humans is to grow the primordial within the post natal realm<<
– in other words, not merely to *find* the primordial but to *manifest* it here within the personality, within the actions, and fulfil fate, thus giving meaning to life.
It probably escapes few that one of the reasons for spiritual practice is to try and understand the deeper meaning of life. To me what Michael is saying (and I agree) is that the Buddhist doctrines often give the impression that meaning is not to be found here and now but in some 'other' place. That is why Michael quoted that passage which said that as soon as air is breathed contact with the Tao is lost. This is manifestly untrue. To me the entire point of life is that the Tao still supports and nourishes all that we are and all that we experience – and if we can manifest that awareness it redeems life.
To me the Buddhist attitude sometimes seems rather cynical, that in order to find the meaning *behind* life, which is seen in that tradition as purely *mental*, one first has to reject *physical* life as essentially meaningless, and admit that life is essentially 'apart' from anything truly important. Whereas life in my opinion is profoundly important – it's just that its importance is not necessarily clear without deep spiritual work of some kind.
Life cannot be essentially meaningless since meaning is what we live and breathe, what makes us survive. It is of course true that surface self covers up deeper meaning, but I believe that the Taoist way is to *balance* surface self so that deeper self is revealed within the personality and *used* to fulfil *destiny*. Later Heaven, in other words, *need* not be a manifestation of Early Heaven, but if we have the skill to make it so, *can* be.
Why do I say that the attitude of some kinds of Buddhism seems 'cynical' to me? – and not only Buddhism but Hinduism sometimes too? (Please understand I am not trying to insult anybody! I am just giving my gut reaction, the one I've always had. I would love to be told that this is not what Buddhists mean). It is because what some followers of these ways say often comes perilously close to the idea that, as soon as you are born, you have made some kind of mistake – you take your first gulp of air and with that gulp become "guilty of being alive". That means every human being alive is making this mistake, and every tree, every animal, everything.
Whereas what I believe is that, by our very actions and the way we live, we *determine* whether physical life is indeed a mistake. If we can allow what is deeper to manifest we find the way, right here in the Later Heaven and the physical. As we manifest it we ourselves prove the reasons and meaning of life, as it is actually lived.
One of Michael's first posts to me said something I had already learned independently, which is that there are certain forces in the universe that believe humanity's physical incarnation is a mistake to be corrected, rather than an opportunity to be grasped. Let us not play into their hands, he said, and I agree. We have to understand that we have come here to give meaning, or not, as we choose and have the heart to do. Thus to me it is a vital philosophical principle *never* to say that one is 'cut off from the Tao' by being alive. At most one could say one is potentially cut off from it. But even that is not really true – if it were, there would be no way back to the primordial, and there is.
What is at stake here, the meaning of our lives and destinies, demands that we recognise we are engines of the Tao here and now in the real physical world. How *could* we ever really be 'separate'?
NN
August 7, 2006 at 3:15 pm #16144FajinParticipantHi Bagua,
You said things nicely. Except, I wouldn’t say that they polarize because things are already polarized. Buddhists just view things in a certain way to help them to see the isness, or the oneness. This kind of view is required if your intent is on the beyond. That’s why the sutras are transcendent wisdom. It is beyond the polarities, non-duality.
But like you said, there is a restoration to the primordial nature, or the return to the root with both paths, except Zen is about the diamond in the rough, solely.
To me, the experience is different though. Daoist nei dan is harmonizing the movement into stillness and you cannot enter a samadhi. The super-concsious state of awareness is indescribable in words through Zen. I particularly liked Dogen’s shikantaza. What kind of Chan do you practice, Bagua?
Fajin
August 7, 2006 at 3:35 pm #16146baguaParticipantHi fajin:
Humans are variations within the universe, the five shen are just variations of the yuan shen. If we look at Yuan shen in two we have hun and po. If we look at the yuan shen as five we have five shen, they are inseparable. Either model is effective.
If one of the five shen (ways to experience life)has been caused to extend to an extreme from many possibilities: abuse, stress, over-activity, diet, etc. they polarize, by this I mean they are out of balance and all kinds of conditions manifest which prevent us from living from a yuan space or awareness. We chase the problems associated with the “out of balance five shen system”, for exmaple, Yi is to much theory, to intellectual, too anal.
Our practices help restore the balance and allow the possiblity to live from a yuan awareness. There are many flowery ways to say this in alchemical and spiritual terms, but this is as clear in every day terms as I can express.
There is only one Zen, no more no less. Everything else is fantasy.
Smiling in the Dao,
bagua
August 7, 2006 at 4:15 pm #16148Michael WinnKeymasterThanks Nnoonth for refocusing my comments on what was intended.
It’s not that I disagree with you Fajin – our ultimate ming/destiny is to cultivate our xing, our inner essence, if successful it allows us as an immortal to function freely from within the primordial and shape it as needs be to participate in the broader multi-dimensional process of Creation. But neidan isn’t a one way ticket – its a two way process in which ming and xing mourish each other.
But it’s NOT your ming as a human being in a body to ignore the world, as if Original Spirit was somehow separate from it. That’s why I was cautioning you, don’t fall into the trap of thinking some samadhi state is meaningful in any ultimate way. These openings are just carrots along the Way, to entice you to go deeper. Expect closings will follow, forcing you to seek openings of a different nature. the will to manifest the soul is not so weak as to rollover and sit in a blank state of bliss for eighty years….
Just wait long enough, and the deeper demands of your body and worldly destiny (actually exerted by your soul pattern) will re-assert themselves and begin pulling on you to complete them. The cave will grow old eventually, for all but a very few whose destiny it is to be a lifelong hermit. As your worldly destiny re-asserts itself, either you keep running away from it, trying to escape your inner voices by suppressing them or by focusing on an unmanifest plane, or you respond to them and ask, what is it that you (I) came here to complete?
Do you think the Primordial needs your puny little body to realize itself, that its sole purpose in reducing its consciousness down to a slowly vibrating sexed human body was so that through you it could transcend the reality of its limitations, and that your soul destiny was only to love the unmanifest Origin and not the rest of manifest Creation?
That sounds like a spiritually pretty insecure Primordial to me, one that is totally co-dependent on getting love from its own lesser creation. I think the process of the Tao is much deeper, not a mere “Get in a body, then get out as fast as possible to please the Original Spirit”.
The 10,000 Things ARE the Body of the Original Spirit, and their life rhythm is its process. Tao has spent billions of years in physical time perfecting the manifestation process of bodies, so let’s not underestimate the importance of manifestation in our spiritual journey. this is the weak suit of Chan; I am not trying to discourage you from exploring its strengths.
I will re-state my intention by quoting the advice of another Taoist master to me, Ni Hua Ching. “Don’t go to the mountains too early”, he cautioned, reflecting on his own experience. “You can get so pure that later its nearly impossible to live in the rest of the polluted world….your destiny becomes very difficult.”
Wishing you deepest completion,
michaelAugust 7, 2006 at 4:57 pm #16150FajinParticipantThank goodness for those power naps, otherwise I would be sleeping (3:30 am) during this lovely discussion.
Michael,
My main point for ming and xing is that they are dualities and that there is something between the dualities. When we live in that between, ming and xing do their stuff, ie. mutually nourish each other.
It is not that I have gone through a samadhi and now I think about going to a cave to cultivate this experience deeper and deeper. You maintain this wu-wei through all action. Wether you are chopping wood and carrying water or typing something from China to the States.
It’s about living your life like this all the time. Some people tend to do away with attachments in the world and go to a cave because that’s all that they really need. That is all that anyone really needs, to become who they really are.
And it is not that it is for the purpose of getting out of your body just for original spirit. You relate this out-of-body to ungroudedness or heaven, which is complementary to earth. This is within grounded/ungrounded (heaven/earth).
Yuan shen is the primordial concsiousness within the yin-yang concsiousness of xin and yi. It is the primordial concsiousness within the wuxing concsiousness of the five shen. It is the primordial concsiousness within the bagua concsiousness of 8 chakras. This is a super-concsiousness state of awareness and life is lived in this state.
Smiles,
FajinAugust 7, 2006 at 5:10 pm #16152FajinParticipantBagua,
If a Daoist attempts to balance something, it was previously imbalanced. That’s what I meant by them being polarized.
The state of awareness I meant is wu-hsin, no mind. You cannot experience something if you are one with the experience. Hence, I do not experience, it is experienced. That’s what I mean by the experience being different with Dao and Zen.
The same things happen, and the experience is the same, but there is no experiencer to experience in Zen, otherwise we are taking sides, not neutraity. Dao aims at movement, Zen aims at stillness.
Fajin
August 7, 2006 at 5:39 pm #16154NnonnthParticipant>>The 10,000 Things ARE the Body of the Original Spirit<<
– that is it in a nutshell – mind you Max says his teachers say the same. So I don't understand this business of 'illusion' and being disconnected from Tao by being in a body that, if Max's teachers don't say it, still seems to get said.
I would also like to reply to Fajin when he says that 'Tao aims at movement, Zen at stillness' – that is a strong statement of this duality I think. What we are talking about here is to say that there is ultimately no difference between movement and stillness since each is connected to the other. You could say that Tao aims at stillness through movement, first to make the movement into a reflection of stillness. I don't know enough about zen to say if perhaps it goes in the other direction, making stillness first.
Would like to affirm I'm not seeing this as an 'argument'. I'm talking here about things that I have heard Buddhists and Hindus say all my life and just never understood!
NN
August 7, 2006 at 5:45 pm #16156FajinParticipantHi Nnonnth,
I don’t think what I said was dualistic. Movement is yin-yang. Stillness is between them just as it is between inhalation and exhalation. Here’s what I meant.
Dao works with movement until the Daoist gets stillness. Zen only works with stillness because that is the final goal.
Btw,glad you came back to the forum, your posts are very interesting! ๐
Smiles,
Fajin -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.